Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 207–226

DOI
10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Published
2023-11-04
Publisher
Indonesian Mathematical Society
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstract

This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 126 co-authorship links · 47 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • State University of Medan
  • Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University
  • Satya Wacana Christian University
  • Gunma University
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sufyani PrabawantoIndonesia University of Education6
Tatang HermanIndonesia University of Education6
Jarnawi Afgani DahlanIndonesia University of Education4
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education3
Al JupriIndonesia University of Education3
Dilham FardianIndonesia University of Education2
Darhim DarhimIndonesia University of Education2
Lina NurhayatiIndonesia University of Education2
Tri Nova Hasti YuniantaSatya Wacana Christian University2
Wahyudin WahyudinTadulako University2
Lukman LukmanIndonesia University of Education2
E. Elvis NapitupuluState University of Medan1
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education1
Abdul FatahSultan Ageng Tirtayasa University1
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education1
Isnarto -Affiliation unknown1
Takashi ItohGunma University1
Nadya Syifa UtamiAffiliation unknown1
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education1
Agus HendriyantoIndonesia University of Education1
Riyan HidayatUniversiti Putra Malaysia1
Yousef WardatHigher Colleges of Technology1
Sani SaharaIndonesia University of Education1
Lukman Hakim MuhaiminIndonesia University of Education1
Krida Singgih KuncoroAffiliation unknown1
Wilda Syam TonraAffiliation unknown1
Endang Cahya MulyaningAffiliation unknown1
KusnandiAffiliation unknown1
Nyiayu Fahriza FuadiahUniversitas PGRI Palembang1
Nelly FitrianiIKIP Siliwangi1
Muhammad Win AfganiUniversitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang1
Ika MeikaUniversitas Mathla'ul Anwar Banten1
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education1
Indah Puspita SariIKIP Siliwangi1
Mohamad Gilar JatisundaUniversitas Majalengka1
Uba UmbaraUniversitas Muhammadiyah Kuningan1
Talisadika S. MaifaIndonesia University of Education1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, first harvested 28 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level</dc:title><dc:creator>Sari, Atika Defita</dc:creator><dc:creator>Suryadi, Didi</dc:creator><dc:creator>Dasari, Dadan</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;This study aims to determine students learning obstacles in probability material based on their probabilistic thinking (PT) level using the theory of didactical situation (TDS) perspective. This is qualitative research with the case study method. The subject consisted of 23 grade 9 students in junior high school who had studied the material and had taken the test. The test results were used to classify students depending on their PT level using the framework developed by Graha A. Jones. Furthermore, interviews were performed with three representative students from each PT level. The interviews indicated that students in each PT level continue to face learning obstacles, which include instrumental ontogenic and epistemological obstacles. The lowest PT level demonstrated a more complex and comprehensive learning obstacle in all constructs of PT. From the TDS perspective, all students who are at various levels of PT have reached an action situation. Only 33% of the students at the subjective level and 83% of the students at the transition level reached the formulation situation. Still, students at that level needed help to reach the other two situations. Unlike the two previous levels, students at the level of quantitative informal thinking can achieve situations of validation and institutionalization.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2023-11-04</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 15 No 1 (2023); 207-226</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>http://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/download/510/113</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>