Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal SINTA 1

Measuring teachers' beliefs about mathematics teaching: A Rasch analysis of a deep learning approach

Infinity Journal · Vol. 15 No. 3 (2026) · pp. 921–940

DOI
10.22460/infinity.v15i3.p921-940
ISSN
2460-9285, 2089-6867
Published
2026-08-08
Publisher
IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Teachers' beliefs significantly influence the efficacy of mathematics education. The absence of an instrument to assess beliefs about deep learning poses a challenge for evaluating and enhancing mathematics teachers' competence in adopting deep learning. This research aims to develop and test the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure mathematics teachers' beliefs about implementing deep learning. This research involved 108 mathematics teachers from five provinces in Indonesia. The research data were collected using a questionnaire with a three-dimensional scale: mindful learning, meaningful learning, and joyful learning. The collected research data were then analyzed using the Rasch model, assisted by Winstep software version 3.73. The results of the first calibration indicated that the instrument's quality was very good, and the respondents' answers were quite consistent. The analysis was continued by examining each person and item more closely, resulting in the identification of three items as misfits. The second calibration was carried out by eliminating the misfit statement items. In the second calibration, a valid, reliable, and unidimensional instrument was obtained, which did not exhibit bias towards any of the research attributes. The instrument demonstrated very good reliability, and respondents' answers were quite consistent. After repeated calibration, a deep learning belief measurement instrument was obtained, consisting of 17 high-quality items with adequate psychometric properties.

Collaboration network of the authors

34 authors · 87 co-authorship links · 32 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Universitas PGRI Semarang
  • State University of Malang
  • National Taiwan Normal University
  • Sultan Idris Education University
  • Darul Ulum Islamic University
  • UIN Syekh Wasil Kediri
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Tatag Yuli Eko SiswonoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya3
Rooselyna EkawatiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya2
Shofan FianggaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya2
Nizaruddin NizaruddinUniversitas PGRI Semarang2
Yanuar Hery MurtiantoUniversitas PGRI Semarang2
Elly Matul ImahUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Siti Maghfirotun AminUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Dwi JuniatiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Sugi HartonoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Endah Budi RahajuUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Abdur RohimDarul Ulum Islamic University1
Yurizka Melia SariUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Yulia Izza El MillaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Dwi Shinta RahayuUIN Syekh Wasil Kediri1
Farida NursyahidahState University of Semarang1
Nurina HappyUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Sutrisno SutrisnoUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Adelia Dian PratiwiUniversitas PGRI Semarang1
Agung LukitoUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Kai‐Lin YangNational Taiwan Normal University1
Khoirun NisaUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
I Wayan DasnaState University of Malang1
Munzil MunzilState University of Malang1
Siti Nurul HidayatiUniversitas Negeri Surabaya1
Surjani WonorahardjoState University of Malang1
Yusuf HartonoSriwijaya University1
Darmawijoyo DarmawijoyoAffiliation unknown1
Rooselyna EkawatiAffiliation unknown1
Fou-Lai LinNational Taiwan Normal University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

This record comes from Crossref (what the publisher deposited), because the journal's own OAI-PMH endpoint could not be harvested.

Metadata source: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2460-9285/works, first harvested 28 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata as oai_dc, converted from Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Measuring teachers' beliefs about mathematics teaching: A Rasch analysis of a deep learning approach</dc:title><dc:creator>Muhtarom, Muhtarom</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kohar, Ahmad Wachidul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sugiyanti, Sugiyanti</dc:creator><dc:creator>Albab, Irkham Ulil</dc:creator><dc:creator>Rejeki, Sri</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Teachers' beliefs significantly influence the efficacy of mathematics education. The absence of an instrument to assess beliefs about deep learning poses a challenge for evaluating and enhancing mathematics teachers' competence in adopting deep learning. This research aims to develop and test the validity and reliability of an instrument to measure mathematics teachers' beliefs about implementing deep learning. This research involved 108 mathematics teachers from five provinces in Indonesia. The research data were collected using a questionnaire with a three-dimensional scale: mindful learning, meaningful learning, and joyful learning. The collected research data were then analyzed using the Rasch model, assisted by Winstep software version 3.73. The results of the first calibration indicated that the instrument's quality was very good, and the respondents' answers were quite consistent. The analysis was continued by examining each person and item more closely, resulting in the identification of three items as misfits. The second calibration was carried out by eliminating the misfit statement items. In the second calibration, a valid, reliable, and unidimensional instrument was obtained, which did not exhibit bias towards any of the research attributes. The instrument demonstrated very good reliability, and respondents' answers were quite consistent. After repeated calibration, a deep learning belief measurement instrument was obtained, consisting of 17 high-quality items with adequate psychometric properties.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>IKIP Siliwangi Bandung</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-08-08</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v15i3.p921-940</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22460/infinity.v15i3.p921-940</dc:identifier><dc:source>Infinity Journal; Vol 15 No 3 (2026); 921-940</dc:source><dc:source>2460-9285</dc:source><dc:source>2089-6867</dc:source><dc:relation>https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/download/7273/2564</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>