Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal SINTA 1

Validity and Reliability of Online Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Critical Reasoning Instrument

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024)

DOI
10.15294/2hnw4674
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2024-06-30
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Information regarding the evaluation of reasoning skills related to online socio-scientific issues is still limited due to limited instruments. This research aims to determine the validity and reliability of an online socio-scientific issue-based critical reasoning instrument. Content validity was proven by the assessment method by five experts. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out with the Lisrel 8.8 program to prove construct validity. Instrument testing was carried out on 145 grade 10 high school students. Convergent validity was determined through the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) calculation, and reliability was determined through Construct Reliability (CR). There are 12 items from four dimensions of critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues: (1) evaluating SSI information, (2) identifying SSI complexity, (3) checking the credibility of information sources, and (4) multiperspective. The results of the content validity test obtained the Aiken coefficient value in the valid category. Based on the analysis results, the GFI, RMSEA, and p-value of the instrument fit the model and have loading factors that meet the minimum criteria. In addition, the instrument meets convergent validity and internal consistency. Thus, it is concluded that the instrument is declared valid and reliable and can be used to measure critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 90 co-authorship links · 15 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • State University of Malang
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universiti of Malaysia Sabah
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhamad Galang IsnawanAffiliation unknown4
Naif Mastoor AlsulamiAffiliation unknown4
Ramadhita RamadhitaAffiliation unknown4
Syabbul BachriAffiliation unknown4
Cholis Sa’dijahState University of Malang2
Wanda Nugroho YanuartoMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto2
Ebenezer BonyahAffiliation unknown2
Yusnaeni YusnaeniAffiliation unknown2
Nandariyah NandariyahAffiliation unknown2
Subanji SubanjiState University of Malang1
Indriati Nurul HidayahState University of Malang1
Widha SunarnoSebelas Maret University1
Yetty TrisnayantiSebelas Maret University1
S SukarminSebelas Maret University1
Zuhair JamainUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah1
Sajidan SajidanSebelas Maret University1
Suranto SurantoSebelas Maret University1
Riezky Maya ProbosariSebelas Maret University1
Bartolomeus Kristi Brahmantia PutraSebelas Maret University1
Mr MaridiSebelas Maret University1
Sigit PrastowoAffiliation unknown1
Shavya Sarah SavieraAffiliation unknown1
Rebecca VanessaAffiliation unknown1
Galih PambukoAffiliation unknown1
Ari SusilowatiAffiliation unknown1
Edi CahyonoUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Kadir KadirUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Mahardhika BerliandaldoIndonesian Institute of Sciences1
Achmad ChodiqIndonesian Institute of Sciences1
A. PurwantoYogyakarta State University1
didik purwiyantoAffiliation unknown1
B A SetionoAffiliation unknown1
Muh. RusmayadiAffiliation unknown1
Samsuriadi SamsuriadiAffiliation unknown1
Jenisus O. DejarloAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Oct 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Validity and Reliability of Online Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Critical Reasoning Instrument</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">yokhebed, yokhebed</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sutarno, Sutarno</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Masykuri, Mohammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Adi Prayitno, Baskoro</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">sudirman , sudirman </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">critical reasoning; instrument; online; reliability; socio-scientific issue; validity</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Information regarding the evaluation of reasoning skills related to online socio-scientific issues is still limited due to limited instruments. This research aims to determine the validity and reliability of an online socio-scientific issue-based critical reasoning instrument. Content validity was proven by the assessment method by five experts. Confirmatory factor analysis was carried out with the Lisrel 8.8 program to prove construct validity. Instrument testing was carried out on 145 grade 10 high school students. Convergent validity was determined through the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) calculation, and reliability was determined through Construct Reliability (CR). There are 12 items from four dimensions of critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues: (1) evaluating SSI information, (2) identifying SSI complexity, (3) checking the credibility of information sources, and (4) multiperspective. The results of the content validity test obtained the Aiken coefficient value in the valid category. Based on the analysis results, the GFI, RMSEA, and p-value of the instrument fit the model and have loading factors that meet the minimum criteria. In addition, the instrument meets convergent validity and internal consistency. Thus, it is concluded that the instrument is declared valid and reliable and can be used to measure critical reasoning based on online socio-scientific issues.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpii/article/view/4208</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/2hnw4674</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): June 2024</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/jpii/article/view/4208/1031</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>