Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

The Legal Basis of Electronic Signatures in Civil Dispute Evidence in Indonesia: A Study of the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law): Dasar Hukum Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Indonesia (UU ITE)

Annual Review of Legal Studies · Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024) · pp. 373–398

DOI
10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498
ISSN
3047-7875, 3047-7581
Published
2024-06-09
Publisher
Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

Documents signed electronically using electronic signatures are governed by the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), which regulates electronic information, electronic documents, and/or their printed results. According to the ITE Law, printed results, electronic documents, and/or electronic information are all considered valid additional evidence that can be used in court. These pieces of evidence constitute an extension and valid evidence according to the applicable procedural law in Indonesia and are also valid evidence in court. The research technique used to compile this article is literature research or normative juridical method, classified as legal research. Several court decisions have defined the legal authority of electronic signatures from the perspective of civil law. Thus, it is clear that from the perspective of civil law, electronic signatures have the same legal force as traditional signatures made with wet ink and have legal consequences. The considerations of judges in civil judgments consist of two parts: factual considerations, which are the evidence submitted by the parties, which party's evidence reaches the minimum threshold of proof, what arguments are proven, and to what extent the probative value held by the parties. The second part relates to legal considerations, including articles in statutory regulations and unwritten law as the basis for making judgments.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

39 authors · 94 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Yustina Dhian NovitaAffiliation unknown3
Dewi Zahra SetyawatiAffiliation unknown2
Veyza OliviaAffiliation unknown2
Armanda N ArdiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Qlarissa MelindaAffiliation unknown2
Hisyam Maliki AkbarAffiliation unknown2
Fitria DamayantiAffiliation unknown2
Zainurohmah ZainurohmahAffiliation unknown2
Rizqiya Lailatul IzzaAffiliation unknown2
Indriana FirdausAffiliation unknown2
Dian LatifianiAffiliation unknown2
Suhadi SuhadiAffiliation unknown1
Cahya WulandariState University of Semarang1
Kartika Fajar CahyaniAffiliation unknown1
Iwan SulistiyoAffiliation unknown1
Wahyudin WahyudinAffiliation unknown1
Yusuf Dwi UtomoAffiliation unknown1
Annisa TussalehaAffiliation unknown1
assayyidahfadlilahAffiliation unknown1
Pratama Herry HerlambangAffiliation unknown1
Farkhan Radyafani WinarnoAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad HabiburrahmanAffiliation unknown1
Nur Arif NugrahaAffiliation unknown1
Ali MurtadhoAffiliation unknown1
Rayi Kharisma RajibAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad RofiqAffiliation unknown1
Vini Wiratno PutriAffiliation unknown1
Nurul FibriantiAffiliation unknown1
Lesa ParantiAffiliation unknown1
Alifa Rizqia RachmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Cahya MadaniAffiliation unknown1
R Benny RiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Rizky Yanda ShagiraAffiliation unknown1
Lutfi UlinuhaAffiliation unknown1
Wahyudin WahyudinAffiliation unknown1
Raphael Bertrand MayakaAffiliation unknown1
pingky auliyaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">The Legal Basis of Electronic Signatures in Civil Dispute Evidence in Indonesia: A Study of the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law): Dasar Hukum Tanda Tangan Elektronik dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Perdata di Indonesia: Kajian Terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Indonesia (UU ITE)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Arbaya, Nisma Raditya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Baidhowi, Baidhowi</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Tanda Tangan Elektronik</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Sengketa Perdata</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Pembuktian</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">Documents signed electronically using electronic signatures are governed by the Indonesian Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE Law), which regulates electronic information, electronic documents, and/or their printed results. According to the ITE Law, printed results, electronic documents, and/or electronic information are all considered valid additional evidence that can be used in court. These pieces of evidence constitute an extension and valid evidence according to the applicable procedural law in Indonesia and are also valid evidence in court. The research technique used to compile this article is literature research or normative juridical method, classified as legal research. Several court decisions have defined the legal authority of electronic signatures from the perspective of civil law. Thus, it is clear that from the perspective of civil law, electronic signatures have the same legal force as traditional signatures made with wet ink and have legal consequences. The considerations of judges in civil judgments consist of two parts: factual considerations, which are the evidence submitted by the parties, which party's evidence reaches the minimum threshold of proof, what arguments are proven, and to what extent the probative value held by the parties. The second part relates to legal considerations, including articles in statutory regulations and unwritten law as the basis for making judgments.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-06-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/article/view/6498</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Annual Review of Legal Studies; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024); 373-398</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7875</dc:source>
	<dc:source>3047-7581</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.%a</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/arls/article/view/6498/503</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>10.15294/arls.vol1i2.6498</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 Nisma Raditya Arbaya, Baidhowi Baidhowi (Author)</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>