Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Perbandingan Penggunaan Antara Model Guided Inquiry dengan Guided Discovery Learning dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran TIK

Edu Komputika Journal · Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)

DOI
10.15294/edukomputika.v3i1.20502
ISSN
2599-297X, 2252-6811
Published
2018-01-11
Publisher
Jurusan Teknik Elektro Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

In this study the author tries to compare two models that guided inquiry learning and guided discovery learning. The subjects were three classes in junior Kesatrian 1 Semarang selected by purposive sampling, with details of the two classes of experiments is to apply the model guided inquiry with guided discovery learning in both classes, while classes only used as a control class. To find out improving student learning outcomes The author provides the initial test (pre-test) and final test (posttest). Based on analysis of survey data using t-test and classical completeness. The results of this study indicate that both modes give rise to learning outcomes with the acquisition of the t-test as follows, for a class of guided inquiry thitung 12.017> t table 1.994 (a significant difference), class guided discovery thitung 11.142> ttabel 1,994 (there is a difference significant). From the analysis it can be concluded that both the model can improve student learning outcomes. Then from these two models turned out to be a model guided inquiry further improve student learning outcomes when compared with the model of guided discovery learning. It can be seen from the acquisition value of classical completeness these two classes, namely guided inquiry 83.33% and 77.77% guided discovery learning.

Collaboration network of the authors

23 authors · 37 co-authorship links

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Indonesian Institute of Sciences
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Widya KusumaningsihAffiliation unknown3
Suyatno SuyatnoAffiliation unknown2
Rusdarti RusdartiAffiliation unknown2
Kristin HandayaniAffiliation unknown1
Yelli Ari SubektiAffiliation unknown1
Nunung Kurnia RetnowatiAffiliation unknown1
Tineke KarunikaAffiliation unknown1
Ulfah Mediaty AriefState University of Semarang1
Novita Rizka YulaekhaAffiliation unknown1
Sutarno SutarnoIndonesian Institute of Sciences1
Aswita NurrikaAffiliation unknown1
Nafisatul ChaliyyahAffiliation unknown1
Rasdi EkosiswoyoAffiliation unknown1
Tri Joko RaharjoAffiliation unknown1
Asma Azizah NurillaAffiliation unknown1
Nina OktarinaAffiliation unknown1
Sidik PurnomoAffiliation unknown1
Athi Aliyatus Sya’niAffiliation unknown1
Endang WuryandiniAffiliation unknown1
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang1
Bekti Nanda PratiwiningtyasAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edukom/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Perbandingan Penggunaan Antara Model Guided Inquiry dengan Guided Discovery Learning dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran TIK</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Fajar, Imade Bagus</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sudana, I Made</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In this study the author tries to compare two models that guided inquiry learning and guided discovery learning. The subjects were three classes in junior Kesatrian 1 Semarang selected by purposive sampling, with details of the two classes of experiments is to apply the model guided inquiry with guided discovery learning in both classes, while classes only used as a control class. To find out improving student learning outcomes The author provides the initial test (pre-test) and final test (posttest). Based on analysis of survey data using t-test and classical completeness. The results of this study indicate that both modes give rise to learning outcomes with the acquisition of the t-test as follows, for a class of guided inquiry thitung 12.017&amp;gt; t table 1.994 (a significant difference), class guided discovery thitung 11.142&amp;gt; ttabel 1,994 (there is a difference significant). From the analysis it can be concluded that both the model can improve student learning outcomes. Then from these two models turned out to be a model guided inquiry further improve student learning outcomes when compared with the model of guided discovery learning. It can be seen from the acquisition value of classical completeness these two classes, namely guided inquiry 83.33% and 77.77% guided discovery learning.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Jurusan Teknik Elektro Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-01-11</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/edukom/article/view/20502</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/edukomputika.v3i1.20502</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Edu Komputika Journal; Vol 3 No 1 (2016): Edu Komputika Journal; 49</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2599-297X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6811</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/edukomputika.v3i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/edukom/article/view/20502/9716</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Edu Komputika Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>