Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Evaluating Generic Structure and Language Features of Students’ Recount Texts

English Education Journal · Vol. 14 No. 3 (2024) · pp. 405–415

DOI
10.15294/vqnbjx02
Published
2024-09-15
Publisher
English Education Journal
Language
eng

Abstract

This study analyzes and assesses recount texts written by students, by focusing on the language features and language structures. This analysis is aimed at fostering student’s writing abilities and communication in their personal experience. The study evaluates the generic structure starting from reorientation, events, and reorientation. The language features are evaluated based on content, syntax, and vocabulary. The data of recount texts were taken from students of SMP Negeri 1 Ketanggungan Brebes, particularly class 8A which consists of 33 students, by conducting a purposive sampling technique. The generic structure of recount texts was analyzed using a scoring rubric adapted from Gerot and Wignell (1994). Meanwhile, a content-based analysis model adapted from Brown and Lee (2015) was employed to evaluate the quality of language features, especially content, syntax, and vocabulary. The quality of students’ recount texts is categorized as excellent, good, adequate, and inadequate. The result showed that 46% of students performed excellent level in orientation and 43% of students performed good level in sequence events. However, 12% of students showed an inadequate level of reorientation. It means that students have a good ability to compile the context and background of their recounts. However, some students have difficulty in concluding their recount. The quality of the language features showed that students presented the main idea and related ideas thoroughly but still needed to improve their vocabulary. The analysis results can be a reference for students to self-evaluate their writing, especially recount texts, and improve the quality. Also, it encourages teachers to apply appropriate teaching strategies in writing classrooms, which meet students’ needs.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 145 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown13
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown6
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown6
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown5
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown4
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown4
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Alief Noor FaridaAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurohmahAffiliation unknown1
Saeful BahriAffiliation unknown1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
YuliatiAffiliation unknown1
lidiana astutiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Herwindha MahananiAffiliation unknown1
Angga Pratama Armadi PutraAffiliation unknown1
Maria Kartika Primaquinna SejatiAffiliation unknown1
Awanda Bramantika SaqifantyAffiliation unknown1
Pasca KalisaAffiliation unknown1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown1
Heru SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Dolendra PaudelAffiliation unknown1
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown1
Anik HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Evaluating Generic Structure and Language Features of Students’ Recount Texts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sulistianti, Lilis</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en"> Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Sakhiyya , Zulfa </dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Recount Texts</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Language Features </dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Generic Structure</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study analyzes and assesses recount texts written by students, by focusing on the language features and language structures. This analysis is aimed at fostering student’s writing abilities and communication in their personal experience. The study evaluates the generic structure starting from reorientation, events, and reorientation. The language features are evaluated based on content, syntax, and vocabulary. The data of recount texts were taken from students of SMP Negeri 1 Ketanggungan Brebes, particularly class 8A which consists of 33 students, by conducting a purposive sampling technique. The generic structure of recount texts was analyzed using a scoring rubric adapted from Gerot and Wignell (1994). Meanwhile, a content-based analysis model adapted from Brown and Lee (2015) was employed to evaluate the quality of language features, especially content, syntax, and vocabulary. The quality of students’ recount texts is categorized as excellent, good, adequate, and inadequate. The result showed that 46% of students performed excellent level in orientation and 43% of students performed good level in sequence events. However, 12% of students showed an inadequate level of reorientation. It means that students have a good ability to compile the context and background of their recounts. However, some students have difficulty in concluding their recount. The quality of the language features showed that students presented the main idea and related ideas thoroughly but still needed to improve their vocabulary. The analysis results can be a reference for students to self-evaluate their writing, especially recount texts, and improve the quality. Also, it encourages teachers to apply appropriate teaching strategies in writing classrooms, which meet students’ needs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">English Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2024-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/10393</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/vqnbjx02</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">English Education Journal; Vol. 14 No. 3 (2024): September 2024; 405-415</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/journals/eej/article/view/10393/2362</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2024 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>