Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW LISTENING AND PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUES TO TEACH LISTENING COMPREHENSION USING AUTHENTIC MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ANXIETY (A CASE AT THE TENTH GRADERS OF SMA N 11 KOTA AMBON IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016)

English Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017) · pp. 42–46

DOI
10.15294/eej.v7i1.14684
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2017-06-02
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study is an experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effectiveness of Jigsaw Listening and Problem-Solving techniques in teaching listening comprehension using authentic materials to the students with high and low anxiety. The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA N 11 Kota Ambon in the academic year of 2015/2016. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Jigsaw listening technique was used in the experimental class I, while problem-solving technique was used in experimental class II. To answer research questions number one up to four, T-test was used. To answer research question number five and six, students’ mean scores in experimental class I and II were compared. While two-ways ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to answer the seventh question. The result of this study showed that jigsaw listening and problem-solving techniques were effective to teach listening comprehension to the high and low anxious students. Jigsaw listening was more effective in teaching listening to the low anxious students, while problem-solving technique was more effective in teaching listening to the high anxious students. There was no interaction among jigsaw listening, problem-solving techniques, listening comprehension, and students’ anxiety.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 86 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • State University of Semarang
  • Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown5
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown1
Afief FakhruddinAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Puspa WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Pamujo Effa KusdianangAffiliation unknown1
Zuhrian Ivan ArviantoAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Manikowati ManikowatiAffiliation unknown1
Kiki Nuriska DenhasAffiliation unknown1
Yulianti YuliantiInstitut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI1
Anjar SetiawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Semarang1
Rifki Nurlaili HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Roni WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Setyani Rohmatul MuthohharohAffiliation unknown1
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown1
Ali Akbar RafsanjaniAffiliation unknown1
Oktianti Dwi AryaniAffiliation unknown1
Eva RahmatunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Diana Novietasari BedagamaAffiliation unknown1
Dian Fathur RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Aldin RamdaniAffiliation unknown1
Silvia Nanda Putri EritoAffiliation unknown1
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown1
kifti halimah islamiAffiliation unknown1
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown1
Ade Dwi CahyantiAffiliation unknown1
Fitria Uswatun AzizahAffiliation unknown1
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown1
Imaduddin Abil FidaAffiliation unknown1
Modi Nur KholisohAffiliation unknown1
Dhiayuddin Dzulfikar W TawaryAffiliation unknown1
Pipit AmbarsariAffiliation unknown1
Febri Dhany TriwibowoAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE EFFECTIVENESS OF JIGSAW LISTENING AND PROBLEM-SOLVING TECHNIQUES TO TEACH LISTENING COMPREHENSION USING AUTHENTIC MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ANXIETY (A CASE AT THE TENTH GRADERS OF SMA N 11 KOTA AMBON IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Tuanany, Nurlaila</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linggar Bharati, Dwi Anggani</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study is an experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effectiveness of Jigsaw Listening and Problem-Solving techniques in teaching listening comprehension using authentic materials to the students with high and low anxiety. The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA N 11 Kota Ambon in the academic year of 2015/2016. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Jigsaw listening technique was used in the experimental class I, while problem-solving technique was used in experimental class II. To answer research questions number one up to four, T-test was used. To answer research question number five and six, students’ mean scores in experimental class I and II were compared. While two-ways ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to answer the seventh question. The result of this study showed that jigsaw listening and problem-solving techniques were effective to teach listening comprehension to the high and low anxious students. Jigsaw listening was more effective in teaching listening to the low anxious students, while problem-solving technique was more effective in teaching listening to the high anxious students. There was no interaction among jigsaw listening, problem-solving techniques, listening comprehension, and students’ anxiety.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-06-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14684</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v7i1.14684</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 7 No 1 (2017); 42-46</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14684/8005</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>