Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Gallery Walk and Think-Pair-Share Techniques for Teaching Writing Descriptive Text to Students with High and Low Motivation

English Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 3 (2018) · pp. 206–212

DOI
10.15294/eej.v7i3.20737
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2018-01-18
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of gallery walk and think-pair-share techniques to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation. A quantitative approach is used in this study by applying 2x2 factorial design in the form of pre-test and post-test. 72 students from the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Simo Boyolali who take English subject in the academic year of 2016/2017 are participated in this study. The motivational questionnaire and writing test are used as the instruments of the study. This study reveals several findings: gallery walk technique is effective to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, think-pair-share technique is effective to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, there is no significant difference on the effect of gallery walk technique and think par-share technique towards writing descriptive text achievement of students with high and low motivation, gallery walk technique is more effective to be used to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation compared to think-pair-share technique, the ANOVA test reveals that there is no effective interaction among students’ motivation, teaching technique, and students’ writing achievement. To conclude, gallery walk technique is more effective compared to think-pair-share technique for teaching writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, and there is no effective interaction among students’ motivation, teaching technique and students’ writing achievement. In sum, it can be said that students’ writing achievement is not influenced by motivation; it is influenced by the implementation of teaching techniques.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 136 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown8
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown5
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown3
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Andika Farid AbdillahAffiliation unknown1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAffiliation unknown1
Amalia RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Agus Rofi’iAffiliation unknown1
Ismi KusumaningroemAffiliation unknown1
Masfa MaizaAffiliation unknown1
Daud JiwandonoAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad TauchidAffiliation unknown1
Dafi KhusnitaAffiliation unknown1
Agnes Arum BudianaAffiliation unknown1
Nor ChotimahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Gallery Walk and Think-Pair-Share Techniques for Teaching Writing Descriptive Text to Students with High and Low Motivation</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Dewi Kilas Sinar Nurani, Arsianti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study investigates the effectiveness of gallery walk and think-pair-share techniques to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation. A quantitative approach is used in this study by applying 2x2 factorial design in the form of pre-test and post-test. 72 students from the tenth grade of State Senior High School 1 Simo Boyolali who take English subject in the academic year of 2016/2017 are participated in this study. The motivational questionnaire and writing test are used as the instruments of the study. This study reveals several findings: gallery walk technique is effective to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, think-pair-share technique is effective to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, there is no significant difference on the effect of gallery walk technique and think par-share technique towards writing descriptive text achievement of students with high and low motivation, gallery walk technique is more effective to be used to teach writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation compared to think-pair-share technique,&amp;nbsp; the ANOVA test reveals that there is no effective interaction among students’ motivation, teaching technique, and students’ writing achievement. To conclude, gallery walk technique is more effective compared to think-pair-share technique for teaching writing descriptive text to students with high and low motivation, and there is no effective interaction among students’ motivation, teaching technique and students’ writing achievement. In sum, it can be said that students’ writing achievement is not influenced by motivation; it is influenced by the implementation of teaching techniques.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-01-18</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/20737</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v7i3.20737</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 7 No 3 (2017); 206-212</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v7i3</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/20737/9860</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>