Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers and Gist Strategies on Students with Different Reading Habits in Reading Comprehension

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 10–17

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i1.21997
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2018-03-07
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study is an experimental research with a factorial design addressed to investigate the effectiveness of graphic organizers and GIST strategy to enhance reading comprehension of students with good and poor reading habits. The samples of this study were the twelfth graders of MA Sholahuddin Demak in the academic year of 2016/2017. There were two classes that became the samples of the study. Graphic organizers strategy was used in the first experimental group, and GIST strategy was used in the second experimental group. To answer research questions number one up to four, T-test was used; meanwhile, two-ways ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to answer the fifth up to seventh question. The result of this study showed that graphic organizers and GIST strategy were effective to enhance reading comprehension of students with good and poor reading habits. In addition, there is no significant difference of the use of graphic organizers and GIST strategies to enhance reading comprehension for students with good and poor reading habits. In addition, there is no significant difference of reading habits in using graphic organizers and GIST strategies to enhance reading comprehension. At last, there is no interaction among graphic organizers, and GIST strategies, reading comprehension, and reading habits.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 103 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown4
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown2
Jumadi JumadiAffiliation unknown2
Wahyu Nur HidayatPoliteknik Negeri Malang1
Rahmana Ilmi HakimUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ellvina Pramitadewi PramitadewiAffiliation unknown1
Fauziyatur RohmahAffiliation unknown1
Aldhy Sigma Lintang PamungkasAffiliation unknown1
Heri CahyonoAffiliation unknown1
Moh. AsroriAffiliation unknown1
Dzulkifli AbdullahAffiliation unknown1
Arina YuliartiAffiliation unknown1
Trias SeptianingsihAffiliation unknown1
Abdul KhalimAffiliation unknown1
Evita Ardy PrabasiwiAffiliation unknown1
Retno ApriliyantiAffiliation unknown1
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown1
Rizqi Amalia FAffiliation unknown1
Miftakhul UlumAffiliation unknown1
Nuna Mustikawati DewiAffiliation unknown1
Yuni Awalaturrohmah SolihahAffiliation unknown1
Sri Wuli FirtiatiAffiliation unknown1
Sekar Ranis Anggita PahleviAffiliation unknown1
Isti KristianiAffiliation unknown1
Anis AmperawatyAffiliation unknown1
Iis Siti AisyahAffiliation unknown1
Dewi FatichaAffiliation unknown1
Dery Purnama SaefudinAffiliation unknown1
Tarina DashelaAffiliation unknown1
Iftitah KhayatiAffiliation unknown1
Nazala Wahyu FebriantoAffiliation unknown1
Andini Syita SavitriAffiliation unknown1
Meli FauziahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of Graphic Organizers and Gist Strategies on Students with Different Reading Habits in Reading Comprehension</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Ayiz, Abdul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Warsono, Warsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study is an experimental research with a factorial design addressed to investigate the effectiveness of graphic organizers and GIST strategy to enhance reading comprehension of students with good and poor reading habits. The samples of this study were the twelfth graders of MA Sholahuddin Demak in the academic year of 2016/2017. There were two classes that became the samples of the study. Graphic organizers strategy was used in the first experimental group, and GIST strategy was used in the second experimental group. To answer research questions number one up to four, T-test was used; meanwhile, two-ways ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to answer the fifth up to seventh question. The result of this study showed that graphic organizers and GIST strategy were effective to enhance reading comprehension of students with good and poor reading habits. In addition, there is no significant difference of the use of graphic organizers and GIST strategies to enhance reading comprehension for students with good and poor reading habits. In addition, there is no significant difference of reading habits in using graphic organizers and GIST strategies to enhance reading comprehension. At last, there is no interaction among graphic organizers, and GIST strategies, reading comprehension, and reading habits.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-03-07</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21997</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i1.21997</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 1 (2018): March 2018; 10-17</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/21997/10438</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>