Journal
The Effectiveness of Coop-Dis-Q and Literature Circle Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Different Personalities
English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 66–75
- ISSN
- 2087-0108, 2502-4566
- Published
- 2018-03-16
- Publisher
- Universitas Negeri Semarang
- Language
- eng
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of using Coop-Dis-Q (Cooperative-Discussion-Questioning) and Literature Circle strategies in teaching reading comprehension to extrovert and introvert students. 2x2 factorial design of experimental research was carried out to collect the data from 88 eighth grade students of SMP N 1 Kandeman, Batang. Two experimental groups, A and B, were given two different treatments: Coop-Dis-Q and Literature Circle strategies. The result shows that the Ï = 0.00 for both Coop-Dis-Q and Literature Circle strategies in teaching reading comprehension to extrovert and introvert students which verifies the effectiveness of both two strategies. It wa also found that Coop-Dis-Q is more effective than Literature Circle strategy in teaching reading comprehension since the mean value of post test Coop-Dis-Q shows higher score 27.18 and the value of Ï = 0.00. However, the result also shows that there is no difference between extrovert and introvert personalities in teaching reading comprehension since the value of Ï = 0.310. Further, it was found that the Ï of strategy*type value is 0.638 so there is no interaction between teaching reading comprehension strategies and types of personality on the achievement of reading comprehension which proves that personality does not influence students’ reading comprehension achievement.
Collaboration network of the authors
40 authors · 93 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
- Affiliation unknown
- Different organisations
- Same organisation
- Affiliation unknown
- Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
| Co-author | Organisation | Joint articles |
|---|---|---|
| Dwi Rukmini | Affiliation unknown | 9 |
| Januarius Mujiyanto | Affiliation unknown | 6 |
| Abdurrachman Faridi | Affiliation unknown | 5 |
| Warsono Warsono | Affiliation unknown | 5 |
| Rudi Hartono | Affiliation unknown | 5 |
| Sri Wuli Fitriati | Affiliation unknown | 3 |
| Djoko Sutopo | Affiliation unknown | 3 |
| Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati | Affiliation unknown | 2 |
| Melawati Anggrayani | Affiliation unknown | 2 |
| Fatona Suraya | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Sri Wahyuningsih | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Rochyani Lestiyanawati | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Daning Desy Artyani | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Arina Hafadhotul Husna | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Bambang Ruby Sugiarto | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Masfa Maiza | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Dini Setiana ningrum | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| R Ririn Riyanti | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ima Fitriana Rosyidah | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Betari Irma Ghasani | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ratna Widya Iswara | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Hanny Anisatu Suriya | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Arif Arga Kusuma | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Abdurrahman Faridi | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Nur Laila Hafidhoh | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ahmad Mubais | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Khomsa Bintana | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Dwi Undayasari | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Teguh Kasprabowo | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| DwiAnggani Linggar Bharati | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| sigit sulistiyanto | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Ratih Oktaviani | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Mochamad Adnan Falahuddin | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Dery Purnama Saefudin | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Rangga Permana | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Aulia Priangan | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
| Raikhatuz Zahroh | Affiliation unknown | 1 |
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.