Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Children’s Production of Interlanguage in Speaking English As The Foreign Language

English Education Journal · Vol. 8 No. 4 (2018) · pp. 452–460

DOI
10.15294/eej.v8i4.25697
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2018-09-24
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Acquiring English as a foreign language and using it as a second language (L2) in early years (children up to six years old) at immersion education happen to some process. In that process, the children tend to use L2 spontaneously and produce interlanguage as stated by Selinker (1977). This study aimed to describe children’s production of interlanguage through the features, startegies used by the children in anticipating the influence of native and target language, and the causes. It was a qualitative research of SLA in English-speaking environment. The research subjects were two non-native teachers and fifteen Kindergarten I Integrity students of Bina Bangsa School Semarang. The data were obtained by recording their daily conversation at school for about three months and having interview with the class teachers. The audio and video recordings were transcribed then analyzed based on SLA frameworks proposed by Brown (1973) and Ellis (1985) and interlanguage frameworks drawn on Selinker (1972), Adjemian (1976) and Faerch & Kasper (1983). The interview result were used to get more opinions regarding the interlanguage phenomenon. The results indicated that the students produced interlanguage systematically, permeably, and dynamically. They used strategies of L2 learning and L2 communication to anticipate the influence of their native and target language. Moreover, the students produced interlanguage for some reasons. It was because of language transfer, overgeneralization, and their development of grammatical morphemes, negation, interrogation, and reflexive pronoun in the process of SLA. Language transfer was the main cause of interlanguage happened among the students.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 148 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown14
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown13
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown9
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown9
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown7
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown5
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown3
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown3
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown2
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Siti NurohmahAffiliation unknown1
Saeful BahriAffiliation unknown1
Dian Puspita AnggraeniAffiliation unknown1
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown1
Anik HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Wa Ode Zulhidjah AwalyahInstitut Agama Islam Negeri Kendari1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Indah NurhidayahAffiliation unknown1
Lilis SulistiantiAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Atika PurwaningtyasAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Children’s Production of Interlanguage in Speaking English As The Foreign Language</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>kusumaningtyas, yulia shinta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Fitriati, Sri Wuli</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Acquiring English as a foreign language and using it as a second language (L2) in early years (children up to six years old) at immersion education happen to some process. In that process, the children tend to use L2 spontaneously and produce interlanguage as stated by Selinker (1977). This study aimed to describe children’s production of interlanguage through the features, startegies used by the children in anticipating the influence of native and target language, and the causes. It was a qualitative research of SLA in English-speaking environment. The research subjects were two non-native teachers and fifteen Kindergarten I Integrity students of Bina Bangsa School Semarang. The data were obtained by recording their daily conversation at school for about three months and having interview with the class teachers. The audio and video recordings were transcribed then analyzed based on SLA frameworks proposed by Brown (1973) and Ellis (1985) and interlanguage frameworks drawn on Selinker (1972), Adjemian (1976) and Faerch &amp;amp; Kasper (1983). The interview result were used to get more opinions regarding the interlanguage phenomenon. The results indicated that the students produced interlanguage systematically, permeably, and dynamically. They used strategies of L2 learning and L2 communication to anticipate the influence of their native and target language. Moreover, the students produced interlanguage for some reasons. It was because of language transfer, overgeneralization, and their development of grammatical morphemes, negation, interrogation, and reflexive pronoun in the process of SLA. Language transfer was the main cause of interlanguage happened among the students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-09-24</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/25697</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v8i4.25697</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 8 No 4 (2018): December 2018; 452-460</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v8i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/25697/11565</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>