Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Teachers’questioning Strategies to Scaffold Students’ Learning in Reading

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019) · pp. 128–143

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i1.28110
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2019-01-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to analyze the type of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning in reading, to analyze the students’ responses to answer the teachers’ questions, to analyze teachers’ questioning strategies in order to explain how the questions scaffold students’ learning in reading. The instruments used are classrooms observasion, teachers’ interviews, and document analysis. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach: a case study in Nasima Junior High School by means of questioning strategies proposed by Wragg and Brown (2001). The data are taken from classroom interaction of three teachers and sixty two students in three classes in nine meetings.The study shows that the teachers used all variant of key tactic questions. The most frequent strategy is listening to replies and responding tactic. In the term of students’ responses, the mostly response is active response in pure English. In the case of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning reading, structuring, pitching and putting clearly, and directing and distributing tactic frequently perfome in before reading activities. During reading activities, the teachers performe all variant of key tactic question to scaffold the students, exceptly pacing tactic was never applied. In after reading activities, teachers mostly play sequencing tactic and pitching and putting clearly tactic to scaffold students’ learning reading.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 155 co-authorship links · 10 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry
  • Universitas Esa Unggul
  • Islamic University of Riau
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown10
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown9
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown9
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown7
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown6
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown6
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown5
Hamdani M. SyamUniversitas Syiah Kuala4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown3
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown3
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Rizanna RosemaryUniversitas Syiah Kuala2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Rahmat SalehUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Abdul Rani UsmanUniversitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry1
Dini KhairaniUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Deni YanuarUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Heru Syah PutraAffiliation unknown1
Erman AnomUniversitas Esa Unggul1
Dafrizal SamsudinIslamic University of Riau1
Alber Tigor ArifyantoAffiliation unknown1
Fransiska Tatto Dua LembangAffiliation unknown1
Rolan RolanAffiliation unknown1
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Teachers’questioning Strategies to Scaffold Students’ Learning in Reading</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Anisah, Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wuli Fitriati, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The objectives of this study are to analyze the type of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning in reading, to analyze the students’ responses to answer the teachers’ questions, to analyze teachers’ questioning strategies in order to explain how the questions scaffold students’ learning in reading. The instruments used are classrooms observasion, teachers’ interviews, and document analysis. This study uses descriptive qualitative approach: a case study in Nasima Junior High School by means of questioning strategies proposed by Wragg and Brown (2001). The data are taken from classroom interaction of three teachers and sixty two students in three classes in nine meetings.The study shows that the teachers used all variant of key tactic questions.&amp;nbsp; The most frequent strategy is&amp;nbsp; listening to replies and responding tactic. In the term of students’ responses, the mostly response is active response in pure English. In the case of teachers’ questioning strategies to scaffold students’ learning reading, structuring, pitching and putting clearly, and directing and distributing tactic frequently perfome in before reading activities. During reading activities, the teachers performe all variant of key tactic question to scaffold the students, exceptly pacing tactic was never applied. In after reading activities, teachers mostly play sequencing tactic and pitching and putting clearly tactic to scaffold students’ learning reading.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-01-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/28110</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i1.28110</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2019): March 2019; 128-143</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/28110/12347</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>