Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Realization of Communication Tasks in Negotiating Meaning among EFL learners

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 76–84

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.33854
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2020-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

People currently live at a time where the ability to speak English fluently has become a must for those who attempt to advance in certain fields. In classroom context however communication task is considered as a crucial element of English language teaching. As a strategy of communication, negotiation of meaning plays as a process through which the speakers go to clearly comprehend one another. The aims of this study are to analyze the realization of different communication tasks in negotiating meaning and to dig up those tasks in order to explain its impact on negotiation of meaning. A qualitative method is applied in this study where twenty undergraduate students majoring in English Language Education took part in it. The students were paired and assigned to perform five different communication tasks. The result showed that communication tasks had been effectively used as an opportunity for students to elicit the occurrences of negotiation of meaning in interactions. Moreover, it was discovered that each task type yielded different amount of negotiation. Information gap task came out as the most productive task in promoting negotiation of meaning among the other four with some negotiation of meaning strategies employed by students during negotiation; clarification request, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. In conclusion, engaging students in such communication tasks leading to negotiating meaning helps them in developing their linguistic acknowledgement. It is due to the frequent use of negotiation of meaning strategies can contribute to language development of EFL learners in all level of proficiency.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 155 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown11
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown10
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown10
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown8
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown6
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown4
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown3
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown3
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa ShakiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Prima PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Andika Farid AbdillahAffiliation unknown1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAffiliation unknown1
Amalia RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Communication Tasks in Negotiating Meaning among EFL learners</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Rachma, Nita Sitta</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">People currently live at a time where the ability to speak English fluently has become a must for those who attempt to advance in certain fields. In classroom context however communication task is considered as a crucial element of English language teaching. As a strategy of communication, negotiation of meaning plays as a process through which the speakers go to clearly comprehend one another. The aims of this study are to analyze &amp;nbsp;the realization of different communication tasks in negotiating meaning and to dig up those tasks in order to explain its impact on negotiation of meaning. A qualitative method is applied in this study where twenty &amp;nbsp;undergraduate &amp;nbsp;students &amp;nbsp;majoring in&amp;nbsp; English Language Education took part in it. The students were paired and assigned to perform five different communication tasks. The result showed that communication tasks had been effectively used as an opportunity for students to elicit the occurrences of negotiation of meaning in interactions. Moreover, it was discovered that each task type yielded different amount of negotiation. Information gap task came out as the most productive task in promoting negotiation of meaning among the other four with some negotiation of meaning strategies employed by students during negotiation; clarification request, confirmation checks, and comprehension checks. In conclusion, engaging students in such communication tasks leading to negotiating meaning helps them in developing their linguistic acknowledgement. It is due to the frequent use of negotiation of meaning strategies can contribute to language development of EFL learners in all level of proficiency.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/33854</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.33854</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 1 (2020): March 2020; 76-84</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/33854/14191</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>