Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The The Implementation of Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF) in EFL Writing Class

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 225–233

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.34465
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2020-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Classroom interaction has been an interesting discussion in the research of discourse as well as language education itself. This research was aimed to analyze the implementation of initiation-response-feedback (IRF) model in EFL writing class. IRF is a pattern of classroom interaction found by Sinclair and Coulthard in 1975 that stands for teacher initiation, students’ response and feedback by teacher. This study was a case study with several steps conducted by its researcher in analyzing the data. The analysis of the data began with the process of organizing data from the result of recording, transcribing data into paper-based transcriptions, coding the data, calculating the occurences of the teaching exchange pattern and IRF pattern, reporting the findings, and interpreting the findings. The results of the study showed that both teacher and students implemented the IRF model in teaching and learning process, especially in writing class. In this study there are five teaching exchanges which occurred based on Sinclair and Coulthard (1975)’s model including teacher inform, teacher direct, teacher elicit, student inform, and check. Furthermore, the classroom interaction process in EFL writing class reflected the patterns of IRF sequence. As the conclusion, it is recommended that the teacher should maintain the effectiveness of classroom interaction and give much opportunity to the students to take role in classroom verbal interaction through reflecting the IRF pattern in teaching learning process particularly in EFL writing class.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 132 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown12
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown8
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown8
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown6
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown6
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown4
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown4
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown3
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Rini FidiyaniAffiliation unknown2
Eko MukmintoAffiliation unknown2
Irawaty IrawatyAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
bintang priyanto putriAffiliation unknown2
Holy Latifah HanumAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAffiliation unknown1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAffiliation unknown1
Hafidz DaffaAffiliation unknown1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAffiliation unknown1
Melawati AnggrayaniAffiliation unknown1
Dini Setiana ningrumAffiliation unknown1
Ratna Widya IswaraAffiliation unknown1
Arif Arga KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Nur Laila HafidhohAffiliation unknown1
Dwi UndayasariAffiliation unknown1
IGede Arga AnggaraAffiliation unknown1
sigit sulistiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Ratih OktavianiAffiliation unknown1
Mochamad Adnan FalahuddinAffiliation unknown1
Aldha WilliyanAffiliation unknown1
Jati Widya IswaraAffiliation unknown1
Dery Purnama SaefudinAffiliation unknown1
Endang Siti NurkholidahAffiliation unknown1
Rangga PermanaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The The Implementation of Initiation–Response–Feedback (IRF)  in EFL Writing Class</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Atmojo, Fajar Nugroho Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saleh, Mursid</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Classroom interaction has been an interesting discussion in the research of discourse as well as language education itself. This research was aimed to analyze the implementation of initiation-response-feedback (IRF) model in EFL writing class. IRF is a pattern of classroom interaction found by Sinclair and Coulthard in 1975 that stands for teacher initiation, students’ response and feedback by teacher.&amp;nbsp; This study was a case study with several steps conducted by its researcher in analyzing the data. The analysis of the data began with the process of organizing data from the result of recording, transcribing data into paper-based transcriptions, coding the data, calculating the occurences of the teaching exchange pattern and IRF pattern, reporting the findings, and interpreting the findings. The results of the study showed that both teacher and students implemented the IRF model in teaching and learning process, especially in writing class. In this study there are five teaching exchanges which occurred based on Sinclair and Coulthard (1975)’s model including teacher inform, teacher direct, teacher elicit, student inform, and check. Furthermore, the classroom interaction process in EFL writing class reflected the patterns of IRF sequence. As the conclusion, it is recommended that the teacher should maintain the effectiveness of classroom interaction and give much opportunity to the students to take role in classroom verbal interaction through reflecting the IRF pattern in teaching learning process particularly in EFL writing class.
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/34465</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.34465</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 2 (2020): June 2020; 225-233</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/34465/14350</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>