Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Evaluation of Exercises Compatibility Between Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and 2013 Curriculum Reflected in English Textbook

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2020) · pp. 252–265

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.35742
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2020-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the English textbook which focused on exercises provided, entitled Bahasa Inggris Kelas X (2017). This research used descriptive evaluative study in which all exercises were analyzed toward Revised Bloom;s Taxonomy as well as 2013 Curriculum in order to see its compatibility. Besides, it also examined the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s taxonomy.The results of the study showed that (1) The exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Besides, the knowledge dimensions (factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive) were manifested in the exercises. (2) With regard to the compatibility of the exercises toward 2013 Curriculum, the exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible. The exercises were designed according to the Core Competence and Basic Competence mentioned in 2013 Curriculum as they were divided according to the chapter/topic they belong to. (3) In regard to the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, the Core Competence and Basic Competence in 2013 Curriculum were well designed in line with the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. It was reflected in all basic competences that were hierachically put based on the taxonomy started from the lowest into the highest level. Furthermore, the learning activities found in 2013 Curriculum were done in Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) Although the activities designed in the exercises are following Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Curriculum 2013, the material used were not too suitable with the need of vocational students in which they need more special need. The results of the study are expected to give a valuable contribution that the further study can extent the study to discuss about the quiz or test provided by school or institution to be examined toward the current curriculum and Bloom’s revised tanonomy as well as the students’ special needs in order to encourage the education practitioners to design good quiz or test for the students.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 145 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown11
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown10
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown9
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown6
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown3
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa ShakiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Jumadi JumadiAffiliation unknown2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Wahyu Nur HidayatPoliteknik Negeri Malang1
Rahmana Ilmi HakimUniversity of Brawijaya1
Ellvina Pramitadewi PramitadewiAffiliation unknown1
Fauziyatur RohmahAffiliation unknown1
Aldhy Sigma Lintang PamungkasAffiliation unknown1
Heri CahyonoAffiliation unknown1
Moh. AsroriAffiliation unknown1
Dzulkifli AbdullahAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Prima PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1
Maria Fifi HermawatiAffiliation unknown1
Warsono -Affiliation unknown1
Atiya Mahmud HanaAffiliation unknown1
Arina YuliartiAffiliation unknown1
Evi FebrianaAffiliation unknown1
Trias SeptianingsihAffiliation unknown1
Ulya RosyitaAffiliation unknown1
Abdul KhalimAffiliation unknown1
Evita Ardy PrabasiwiAffiliation unknown1
Riski SafitriAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Evaluation of Exercises Compatibility Between Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and 2013 Curriculum Reflected in English Textbook</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susan, Susandari</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Warsono, Warsono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study was aimed to evaluate the English textbook which focused on exercises provided, entitled Bahasa Inggris Kelas X (2017). This research used descriptive evaluative study in which all exercises were analyzed toward Revised Bloom;s Taxonomy as well as 2013 Curriculum in order to see its compatibility. Besides, it also examined the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s taxonomy.The results of the study showed that (1) The exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. Besides, the knowledge dimensions (factual, conceptual, procedural and metacognitive) were manifested in the exercises. (2) With regard to the compatibility of the exercises toward 2013 Curriculum, the exercises found in Bahasa Inggris textbook were compatible. The exercises were designed according to the Core Competence and Basic Competence mentioned in 2013 Curriculum as they were divided according to the chapter/topic they belong to. (3) In regard to the compatibility of 2013 Curriculum toward Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy,&amp;nbsp; the Core Competence and Basic Competence in 2013 Curriculum were well designed in line with the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. It was reflected in all basic competences that were hierachically put based on the taxonomy started from the lowest into the highest level. Furthermore, the learning activities found in 2013 Curriculum were done in Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) Although the activities designed in the exercises are following Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy and Curriculum 2013, the material used were not too suitable with the need of vocational students in which they need more special need. The results of the study are expected to give a valuable contribution that the further study can extent the study to discuss about the quiz or test provided by school or institution to be examined toward the current curriculum and Bloom’s revised tanonomy as well as the students’ special needs in order to encourage the education practitioners to design good quiz or test for the students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/35742</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.35742</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 2 (2020): June 2020; 252-265</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/35742/14733</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>