Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Effect of Discovery Learning and Direct Instruction on EFL Learners with Different Learning Styles

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2020) · pp. 347–403

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.37131
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2020-09-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study is experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effect of discovery learning and direct instruction on EFL learners with different learning style (The Tenth Graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang). The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang in the 2018/2019 academic year. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Direct Instruction method was used in the experimental class I, while Discovery Learning method was used in experimental class II. To know-how is the effect of direct instruction to visual and auditory and how is the effect of discovery learning to visual and auditory, T-test was used. To know-how is the difference in the achievement between visual and auditory by using direct instruction and discovery learning, students’ mean scores in experimental classes I and II were compared. While two-way ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to know how significant relationships among the methods and the learning style. The result of this study showed that direct instruction and discovery learning methods are effective to be used in teaching writing for visual and auditory learning style students. There were no significant differences in achievement between visual and auditory learning style students using direct instruction and discovery learning methods. For the interaction among the variables, it shows that there was no interaction among the methods, students’ learning style, and students’ writing skill.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 142 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown12
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown11
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown9
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown8
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown7
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown3
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Putri AnggraeniAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Aunur RofiqAffiliation unknown2
Tien RafidaAffiliation unknown2
Rusydi AnandaAffiliation unknown2
Siti HerlindaAffiliation unknown2
Erise AnggrainiAffiliation unknown2
Chandra IrsanAffiliation unknown2
Harman HamidsonAffiliation unknown2
Rosnawintang RosnawintangAffiliation unknown1
Nur AzisahAffiliation unknown1
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Lina ardiyantiAffiliation unknown1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAffiliation unknown1
Yuliana YulianaAffiliation unknown1
Rini MaulidhawatiAffiliation unknown1
Januarius MujiantoAffiliation unknown1
Eka FatmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Warsono -Affiliation unknown1
Dery Tria AgustinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effect of Discovery Learning and Direct Instruction on EFL Learners with Different Learning Styles</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Munfa'ati, Heny</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suwandi, Suwandi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study is experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effect of discovery learning and direct instruction on EFL learners with different learning style (The Tenth Graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang). The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang in the 2018/2019 academic year. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Direct Instruction method was used in the experimental class I, while Discovery Learning method was used in experimental class II. To know-how is the effect of direct instruction to visual and auditory and how is the effect of discovery learning to visual and auditory, T-test was used. To know-how is the difference in the achievement between visual and auditory by using direct instruction and discovery learning, students’ mean scores in experimental classes I and II were compared. While two-way ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to know how significant relationships among the methods and the learning style. The result of this study showed that direct instruction and discovery learning methods are effective to be used in teaching writing for visual and auditory learning style students. There were no significant differences in achievement between visual and auditory learning style students using direct instruction and discovery learning methods. For the interaction among the variables, it shows that there was no interaction among the methods, students’ learning style, and students’ writing skill.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/37131</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.37131</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2020): September 2020; 347-403</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/37131/15395</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>