Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Evaluating the Validity, Reliability and Authenticity of English Achievement Test for the Twelfth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi

English Education Journal · Vol. 11 No. 1 (2021) · pp. 130–138

DOI
10.15294/eej.v11i1.44176
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2021-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the implementation of the English achievement test for the twelfth-grade students at SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi in the academic year 2019/2020. This study was a contenr analyis. The objects of this study were English achievement test items. It consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions and 5 essay questions. The data collection method was a document analysis checklist. In this study, the researcher analyzed the data from English achievement test for validity aspects such as content validity and construct validity, the degree of reliability, and the implementation of language authenticity criteria. The findings of this study revealed that; (1) the content validity shows 76% valid, and the construct validity shows 60% valid; (2) the reliability shows coefficient 0.281 for multiple-choice items and 0,554 for essay items, and it is reliable; (3) the results of analyzing the authenticity shows that the listening items, reading test and essay writing are authentic. However, each part has some weaknesses. Especially in the reading test, most of the passages use in reading tests failed to represent the world context even though the topics of the passages are rational and based on the real context. Nevertheless, the English teacher who constructed the English achievement test did not mention the sources from which the passages were taken. Next, the samples of the format letter, announcement, and pamphlet look unnatural view from the format and design. Moreover, the English Achievement Test for twelfth-grade students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi has fulfilled the characteristics of validity, reliability, and authenticity as a good test or standardized test.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 140 co-authorship links · 13 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • University of Brawijaya
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown7
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown5
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Muhsin MuhsinAffiliation unknown4
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown3
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown3
Farid SukmanaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Gresik2
Diana PurwitasariInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Satrio Hadi WijoyoUniversity of Brawijaya2
Septiyan Andika IsantaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang2
Niken SubektiState University of Semarang2
Heru SetyantoAffiliation unknown2
Sonika MaulanaAffiliation unknown2
Rifa’atunnisa Rifa’atunnisaAffiliation unknown2
Juhadi JuhadiAffiliation unknown2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa ShakiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Joko WidodoAffiliation unknown2
Heri YantoAffiliation unknown2
Rusdarti RusdartiAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown2
Chastine FatichahInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Yufis AzharUniversitas Muhammadiyah Malang1
Admaja Dwi HerlambangUniversity of Brawijaya1
Amelia WidihastutikAffiliation unknown1
Yohana SetyaniAffiliation unknown1
Atun Sri RejekiAffiliation unknown1
Yulianti YuliantiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Baruna Rizky PerdanaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluating the Validity, Reliability and Authenticity of English Achievement Test for the Twelfth Grade Students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Winarti, Muncar</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rozi, Fahrur</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to investigate the implementation of the English achievement test for the twelfth-grade students at SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi in the academic year 2019/2020. This study was a contenr analyis. The objects of this study were English achievement test items. It consisted of 40 multiple-choice questions and 5 essay questions. The data collection method was a document analysis checklist. In this study, the researcher analyzed the data from English achievement test for validity aspects such as content validity and construct validity, the degree of reliability, and the implementation of language authenticity criteria. The findings of this study revealed that; (1) the content validity shows 76% valid, and the construct validity shows 60% valid; (2) the reliability shows coefficient 0.281 for multiple-choice items and 0,554 for essay items, and it is reliable; (3) the results of analyzing the authenticity shows that the listening items, reading test and essay writing are authentic. However, each part has some weaknesses. Especially in the reading test, most of the passages use in reading tests failed to represent the world context even though the topics of the passages are rational and based on the real context. Nevertheless, the English teacher who constructed the English achievement test did not mention the sources from which the passages were taken. Next, the samples of the format letter, announcement, and pamphlet look unnatural view from the format and design. Moreover, the English Achievement Test for twelfth-grade students of SMAN 4 Tebo, Jambi has fulfilled the characteristics of validity, reliability, and authenticity as a good test or standardized test.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/44176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v11i1.44176</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 11 No 1 (2021): March 2021; 130-138</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v11i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/44176/18022</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>