Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training Participants at PST”

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 96–103

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2022-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Today, many media to large companies are starting to invest English skills in their employees, including Pura Smart Technology (PST). This research aims to find out the use of cohesive lexical devices, the use of cohesive grammatical devices, the correctness of cohesive device uses, and the correlation of cohesive device use and descriptive text writing skills of the participants. The researcher took eleven employees as the participants. The researcher analyzed the data with Halliday & Hasan's theory, Coh-Metrix 3.0, and Spearman Correlation. The results were repetition with 54.92%, synonym with 6.81%, hyponym with 33.71%, meronym with 3.40%, and collocation with 1.14%. In terms of grammatical cohesion, the researcher found a reference with 29.54% and conjunction with 69.31%. The result also showed that the participants' cohesive device use excellence was 39.65%, with a very strong correlation, (rs) = 0.95. The researchers found that the English training participants had low mastery of cohesive device use quality. The researchers also found that the participants' cohesive devices and writing skills had a strong, significant, and immense correlation. The researchers suggest that future researchers upgrade the study's object and involve participants from different and complex backgrounds. From the pedagogical perspective, cohesive device uses are important to create a good image and judge an excellent educational background between the writer and the reader while understanding the meaning. Thus, writers can produce texts without any hoax information nowadays. Practically, these results help people use text appropriately in formal and non-formal settings.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 111 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown11
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown8
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown5
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
Afief FakhruddinAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Melawati AnggrayaniAffiliation unknown1
Puspa WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Pamujo Effa KusdianangAffiliation unknown1
Dini Setiana ningrumAffiliation unknown1
Zuhrian Ivan ArviantoAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaila TuananyAffiliation unknown1
Manikowati ManikowatiAffiliation unknown1
Ratna Widya IswaraAffiliation unknown1
Kiki Nuriska DenhasAffiliation unknown1
Yulianti YuliantiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Arif Arga KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Nur Laila HafidhohAffiliation unknown1
Dwi UndayasariAffiliation unknown1
IGede Arga AnggaraAffiliation unknown1
Anjar SetiawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Semarang1
sigit sulistiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Ratih OktavianiAffiliation unknown1
Mochamad Adnan FalahuddinAffiliation unknown1
Rifki Nurlaili HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Roni WahyudiAffiliation unknown1
Dery Purnama SaefudinAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Text by English Training   Participants at PST”</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>islami, kifti halimah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saleh, Mursid</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linggar Bharati, Dwi Anggani</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Today, many media to large companies are starting to invest English skills in their employees, including Pura Smart Technology (PST). This research aims to find out the use of cohesive lexical devices, the use of cohesive grammatical devices, the correctness of cohesive device uses, and the correlation of cohesive device use and descriptive text writing skills of the participants. The researcher took eleven employees as the participants. The researcher analyzed the data with Halliday &amp;amp; Hasan's theory, Coh-Metrix 3.0, and Spearman Correlation. The results were repetition with 54.92%, synonym with 6.81%, hyponym with 33.71%, meronym with 3.40%, and collocation with 1.14%. In terms of grammatical cohesion, the researcher found a reference with 29.54% and conjunction with 69.31%. The result also showed that the participants' cohesive device use excellence was 39.65%, with a very strong correlation, (rs) = 0.95. The researchers found that the English training participants had low mastery of cohesive device use quality. The researchers also found that the participants' cohesive devices and writing skills had a strong, significant, and immense correlation. The researchers suggest that future researchers upgrade the study's object and involve participants from different and complex backgrounds. From the pedagogical perspective, cohesive device uses are important to create a good image and judge an excellent educational background between the writer and the reader while understanding the meaning. Thus, writers can produce texts without any hoax information nowadays. Practically, these results help people use text appropriately in formal and non-formal settings.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/49052</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i1.49052</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 1 (2022): March 2022; 96-103</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/49052/21169</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>