Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Use of Cohesive Devices in Research Paper Conference to Achieve Texts Coherence

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 67–75

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i1.53228
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2022-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This paper employs discourse analysis to investigate cohesive devices and coherence in research articles. The research was based on a purposive random sampling of 10 research articles from the 8th ELTLT Conference 2019. The text analyzed in this paper includes the abstract, introduction, research methodology, findings and discussions, and conclusion. We seek to find out grammatical and lexical cohesion as conceptualized by Halliday and Hasan's (1976) concept, i.e., reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, reiteration, and collocation. Furthermore, we discover the relation among research articles to achieve coherence by employing logical relations that highlight Thornbury's (2005) theory. According to the findings, the authors used cohesive devices in the creation of their writing product. From a total of 1955 clauses in 224 paragraphs, it was determined that almost all types of cohesive devices are used throughout the text. The conjunction of addition was the most frequently used cohesive device in the texts. Our findings demonstrate that authors engage the additional information to create a text without changing the context in the previous clause or sentence. However, there was no evidence of verbal ellipsis in the texts we examined. It was because the authors did not use both lexical verbs and modal operators. In conclusion, a cohesive device binds text together and bridges the gaps to avoid misleading context and achieve text coherence. Further studies need to explore the use of cohesive devices as a tool to improve the quality of writing.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 154 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown7
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown4
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown4
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa ShakiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown2
YuliatiAffiliation unknown1
lidiana astutiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Herwindha MahananiAffiliation unknown1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Angga Pratama Armadi PutraAffiliation unknown1
Maria Kartika Primaquinna SejatiAffiliation unknown1
WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Awanda Bramantika SaqifantyAffiliation unknown1
Alief Noor FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Pasca KalisaAffiliation unknown1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown1
Heru SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Dolendra PaudelAffiliation unknown1
Indah HandayaniAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Muhamad Dedi Manfaluthi ManfaluthiAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Lilis SulistiantiAffiliation unknown1
Banggala Puja SenaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Prima PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Use of Cohesive Devices in Research Paper Conference to Achieve Texts Coherence</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Akmilia, Perwari Melati</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrachman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sakhiyya, Zulfa</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This paper employs discourse analysis to investigate cohesive devices and coherence in research articles. The research was based on a purposive random sampling of 10 research articles from the 8th ELTLT Conference 2019. The text analyzed in this paper includes the abstract, introduction, research methodology, findings and discussions, and conclusion. We seek to find out grammatical and lexical cohesion as conceptualized by Halliday and Hasan's (1976) concept, i.e., reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, reiteration, and collocation. Furthermore, we discover the relation among research articles to achieve coherence by employing logical relations that highlight Thornbury's (2005) theory. According to the findings, the authors used cohesive devices in the creation of their writing product. From a total of 1955 clauses in 224 paragraphs, it was determined that almost all types of cohesive devices are used throughout the text. The conjunction of addition was the most frequently used cohesive device in the texts. Our findings demonstrate that authors engage the additional information to create a text without changing the context in the previous clause or sentence. However, there was no evidence of verbal ellipsis in the texts we examined. It was because the authors did not use both lexical verbs and modal operators. In conclusion, a cohesive device binds text together and bridges the gaps to avoid misleading context and achieve text coherence. Further studies need to explore the use of cohesive devices as a tool to improve the quality of writing.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/53228</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i1.53228</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 1 (2022): March 2022; 67-75</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/53228/20875</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>