Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Realization of Formulaic Expressions in EFL Teacher-Student Classroom Interactions

English Education Journal · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 121–130

DOI
10.15294/eej.v12i1.54521
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2022-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Formulaic expressions are essential for developing students' communicative competence to speak English naturally and fluently. This research aimed to determine how the EFL teachers and students used the five types of formulaic expressions in their classroom interactions. This study is discourse analysis, particularly conversation analysis, using a qualitative research approach. The research subjects were two teachers and thirty-one students from two different EFL classes in a private high school in Semarang. The data were obtained by recording their 5x40 minutes' classroom interactions. The video recordings were transcribed and then observed. After all of the data were collected, they were classified and analyzed based on Biber et al.'s (1999) framework and then described qualitatively. The study results showed that the teachers and the students realized all five types of formulaic expressions; lexical bundles, idiomatic phrases, free combinations of verb+particle, binomial expressions, and inserts. It shows that the teachers and the students are able to speak relatively natural English. By doing the further analysis, it was also found that even though the teachers used the formulaic expressions a lot more than the students, the orders of the frequency of formulaic expressions used are similar, as well as some expressions used. Surprisingly, it was revealed that there were some expressions which were not used by the teachers but were realized by the students.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 157 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown10
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown9
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown8
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown7
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown7
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown5
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown3
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Irawaty IrawatyUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Rini FidiyaniAffiliation unknown2
Eko MukmintoAffiliation unknown2
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown2
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Holy Latifah HanumAffiliation unknown1
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAffiliation unknown1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAffiliation unknown1
Hafidz DaffaAffiliation unknown1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Andika Farid AbdillahAffiliation unknown1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Formulaic Expressions in EFL Teacher-Student Classroom Interactions</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Indriyani, Lia</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Formulaic expressions are essential for developing students' communicative competence to speak English naturally and fluently. This research aimed to determine how the EFL teachers and students used the five types of formulaic expressions in their classroom interactions. This study is discourse analysis, particularly conversation analysis, using a qualitative research approach. The research subjects were two teachers and thirty-one students from two different EFL classes in a private high school in Semarang. The data were obtained by recording their 5x40 minutes' classroom interactions. The video recordings were transcribed and then observed. After all of the data were collected, they were classified and analyzed based on Biber et al.'s (1999) framework and then described qualitatively. The study results showed that the teachers and the students realized all five types of formulaic expressions; lexical bundles, idiomatic phrases, free combinations of verb+particle, binomial expressions, and inserts. It shows that the teachers and the students are able to speak relatively natural English. By doing the further analysis, it was also found that even though the teachers used the formulaic expressions a lot more than the students, the orders of the frequency of formulaic expressions used are similar, as well as some expressions used. Surprisingly, it was revealed that there were some expressions which were not used by the teachers but were realized by the students.
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/54521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v12i1.54521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 12 No 1 (2022): March 2022; 121-130</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/54521/21266</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>