Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Politeness Strategies Used by Trump and El-Sisi in Their Speeches at United Nations Assembly

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 1 (2023) · pp. 12–19

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i1.68280
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-03-15
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

In this study, the researchers identified ways that politeness strategies are commonly employed in a speech. Specifically, this study aimed at exploring the politeness strategies used by Donald Trump and General El Sisi during their speech at the 75th session of the UN General Assembly. Both the similarities and the differences between Donald Trump’s and General Sisi's use of politeness strategies and sub-strategies in their speeches were investigated. A qualitative research approach was conducted, and the theory of politeness strategies by Brown and Levinson was applied as the analysis framework. The research data was collected from the 57 utterances in Trump's speech and 79 utterances in General Sisi's speech. The analysis results showed that both Trump and El-Sisi applied bald on record, positive, and negative politeness. Specifically, the politeness strategies found in Trump's speech were 10 utterances of bald on record, 53 utterances of positive politeness, 8 utterances of negative politeness, and two utterances of off-record strategy. On the contrary, General Sisi's speech mostly contained negative politeness strategies. It was found that there were 70 utterances of negative politeness, 11 utterances of positive politeness, and 1 utterance of off-record strategy. These various politeness strategies used by Donald Trump and General Sisi could not be separated from their respective social positions, social distances, and cultural backgrounds.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 123 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown9
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown6
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown5
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Widya AmaliaAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown4
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown3
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown3
Katharina RustipaAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Indah NurhidayahAffiliation unknown1
Rahmiwati RahmiwatiAffiliation unknown1
Januarius MujiiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Annisa Nur AtikahAffiliation unknown1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi MusthafaAffiliation unknown1
Urfatul MakhsunahAffiliation unknown1
Fahmi Arif SangajiAffiliation unknown1
Yesi Novita SariAffiliation unknown1
Syifa Fellashufa FadillahAffiliation unknown1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Regita Widya MurtiAffiliation unknown1
Melawati AnggrayaniAffiliation unknown1
Dini Setiana ningrumAffiliation unknown1
Ratna Widya IswaraAffiliation unknown1
Arif Arga KusumaAffiliation unknown1
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown1
Nur Laila HafidhohAffiliation unknown1
Dwi UndayasariAffiliation unknown1
IGede Arga AnggaraAffiliation unknown1
sigit sulistiyantoAffiliation unknown1
Ratih OktavianiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Politeness Strategies Used by Trump and El-Sisi in Their Speeches at United Nations Assembly</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Azzahra, Ummi Ashim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Pratama, Hendi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Saleh, Mursid</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In this study, the researchers identified ways that politeness strategies are commonly employed in a speech. Specifically, this study aimed at exploring the politeness strategies used by Donald Trump and General El Sisi during their speech at the 75th session of the UN General Assembly. Both the similarities and the differences between Donald Trump’s and General Sisi's use of politeness strategies and sub-strategies in their speeches were investigated. A qualitative research approach was conducted, and the theory of politeness strategies by Brown and Levinson was applied as the analysis framework. The research data was collected from the 57 utterances&amp;nbsp;in Trump's speech and 79 utterances&amp;nbsp;in General Sisi's speech. The analysis results showed that both Trump and El-Sisi applied bald on record, positive, and negative politeness. Specifically, the politeness strategies&amp;nbsp;found in Trump's speech were 10 utterances of bald on record, 53 utterances of positive politeness, 8 utterances of negative politeness, and two utterances of off-record strategy. On the contrary, General Sisi's speech mostly contained negative politeness strategies. It was found that there were 70 utterances of negative politeness, 11 utterances of positive politeness, and 1 utterance of off-record strategy. These various politeness strategies&amp;nbsp;used by Donald Trump and General Sisi could not be separated from their respective social positions, social distances, and cultural backgrounds.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-03-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/68280</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i1.68280</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 1 (2023): March 2023; 12-19</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/68280/24767</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>