Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Errors in Discourse Marker Usage in Descriptive Texts by SMA Negeri 12 Semarang Students

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 209–220

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.74097
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study delves into the analysis of common errors found in descriptive texts authored by a sample of 32 students, randomly selected from SMA Negeri 12 Semarang. Its primary objective is to identify, categorize, and evaluate errors pertaining to adverbial phrases, conjunctions, prepositional phrases, and discourse markers while assessing their impact on the coherence of the text. Employing a rigorous research methodology encompassing both quantitative and qualitative techniques, this study provides a thorough evaluation of the student's writing abilities. Quantitative analysis of the collected data exposes a spectrum of errors, encompassing discourse marker misuses, sentence structure deficiencies, inaccuracies in prepositional phrases, conjunction errors, and problems with adverbial phrases. Notably, discourse marker errors, including the omission of commas and the repetitive use of words, emerged as the most prevalent issues. These errors have the potential to significantly hinder the clarity and overall flow of the text. The motivation for this study arises from the recognition that students often encounter challenges when it comes to effectively utilizing discourse markers and other grammatical elements in their descriptive writing. These difficulties can adversely impact text coherence and, consequently, the overall quality of the students' compositions. In light of the quantitative findings, this research underscores the critical importance of targeted grammar instruction and consistent writing practice to enhance students' writing skills. Addressing these common errors collaboratively, educators and learners can work towards improving the quality of descriptive texts.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 136 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown11
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown11
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown11
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown8
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown8
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown7
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown6
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown3
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown3
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown2
Putri AnggraeniAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
Lina ardiyantiAffiliation unknown1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAffiliation unknown1
Eka Putri Dea Ayu MaharaniAffiliation unknown1
Warsono -Affiliation unknown1
Dery Tria AgustinAffiliation unknown1
Puspa WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Ika MirantiAffiliation unknown1
Anita Rizky KurniawatiAffiliation unknown1
Abdelbaset Mohamed WajejAffiliation unknown1
Nova Rifqi FaristaAffiliation unknown1
Retno ApriliyantiAffiliation unknown1
Nanda LahitaAffiliation unknown1
Hanhan LovihandrieAffiliation unknown1
Muh Imam ShofwanAffiliation unknown1
Ivvon Septina BellaAffiliation unknown1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAffiliation unknown1
Issy YuliasryAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Rizky RochmawanAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Errors in Discourse Marker Usage in Descriptive Texts by SMA Negeri 12 Semarang Students</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kadyrov, Nurtilek</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wuli Fitriati, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study delves into the analysis of common errors found in descriptive texts authored by a sample of 32 students, randomly selected from SMA Negeri 12 Semarang. Its primary objective is to identify, categorize, and evaluate errors pertaining to adverbial phrases, conjunctions, prepositional phrases, and discourse markers while assessing their impact on the coherence of the text. Employing a rigorous research methodology encompassing both quantitative and qualitative techniques, this study provides a thorough evaluation of the student's writing abilities. Quantitative analysis of the collected data exposes a spectrum of errors, encompassing discourse marker misuses, sentence structure deficiencies, inaccuracies in prepositional phrases, conjunction errors, and problems with adverbial phrases. Notably, discourse marker errors, including the omission of commas and the repetitive use of words, emerged as the most prevalent issues. These errors have the potential to significantly hinder the clarity and overall flow of the text. The motivation for this study arises from the recognition that students often encounter challenges when it comes to effectively utilizing discourse markers and other grammatical elements in their descriptive writing. These difficulties can adversely impact text coherence and, consequently, the overall quality of the students' compositions. In light of the quantitative findings, this research underscores the critical importance of targeted grammar instruction and consistent writing practice to enhance students' writing skills. Addressing these common errors collaboratively, educators and learners can work towards improving the quality of descriptive texts.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/74097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.74097</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 209-220</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/74097/25437</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>