Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

THE PRACTICE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK USED BY A TEACHER IN TEACHING ENGLISH

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 80–91

DOI
10.15294/elt.v7i1.25310
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Published
2018-08-30
Publisher
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study focuses on the practice of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School. The objective of the study is to describe the type of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School and to describe the frequency of each type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching English in SD Semesta Bilingual School. This study is a qualitative research. The data were taken by interviewing an English teacher and taking video of teaching and learning process. The videos were transcribed which in the next step, they were analyzed for gaining the result. The data were analyzed in the noticing, collecting, and thinking process according to the theory of qualitative data analysis by Siedel (1998). According to the analysis, the teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School used all kinds of corrective feedback. The result shows that explicit feedback is the most frequent corrective feedback which represents 24.14%. The other strategies are as follows: (2) Recast occurs 17.24%, (3) Clarification Request occurs 13.79%,(4) Metalinguistic Feedback occurs 13.79%, (5) Elicitation occurss 13.79%, and (6) Repetition occurs 13.79%. The most dominant type of using corrective feedback is explicit correction. The implication of using corrective feedback on English speaking is that, the student will be brave to active on every teaching learning activity especially on speaking.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 146 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown8
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown6
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown5
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown4
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown4
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown4
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown3
Zulfa SakhiyyaAffiliation unknown3
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Frimadhona SyafriAffiliation unknown2
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown2
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown1
Zumala HusnaAffiliation unknown1
Rini Susanti WulandariAffiliation unknown1
Hanum BestariAffiliation unknown1
Alief Noor FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Anindya PangestikaAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown1
Nurlaely HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAffiliation unknown1
Agus PrayogoAffiliation unknown1
Andika Farid AbdillahAffiliation unknown1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAffiliation unknown1
Amalia RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Agus Rofi’iAffiliation unknown1
Ismi KusumaningroemAffiliation unknown1
Masfa MaizaAffiliation unknown1
Daud JiwandonoAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad TauchidAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE PRACTICE OF CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK USED BY A TEACHER IN TEACHING ENGLISH</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Triwinarsih, Endah</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kalisa, Pasca</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study focuses on the practice of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School. The objective of the study is to describe the type of corrective feedback used by a teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School and to describe the frequency of each type of corrective feedback used by the teacher in teaching English in SD Semesta Bilingual School. This study is a qualitative research. The data were taken by interviewing an English teacher and taking video of teaching and learning process. The videos were transcribed which in the next step, they were analyzed for gaining the result. The data were analyzed in the noticing, collecting, and thinking process according to the theory of qualitative data analysis by Siedel (1998). According to the analysis, the teacher in SD Semesta Bilingual School used all kinds of corrective feedback. The result shows that explicit feedback is the most frequent corrective feedback which represents 24.14%. The other strategies are as follows: (2) Recast occurs 17.24%, (3) Clarification Request occurs 13.79%,(4) Metalinguistic Feedback occurs 13.79%, (5) Elicitation occurss 13.79%, and (6) Repetition occurs 13.79%. The most dominant type of using corrective feedback is explicit correction. The implication of using corrective feedback on English speaking is that, the student will be brave to active on every teaching learning activity especially on speaking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v7i1.25310</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 80-91</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25310/11352</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>