Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Detecting Hate Speech Tweets and Abusive Tweets In Indonesian Languange Using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine with Voting Classifier Technique

Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology · Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022) · pp. 24–32

DOI
10.15294/jaist.v4i1.59521
ISSN
2715-999X, 2714-9714
Published
2022-12-08
Publisher
Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstract

The use of social media has become one of the main things in everyday life. This happens because the features provided make it easy for people to communicate and disseminate information. One of the social media used by many people is Twitter. the main feature of twitter is that its users can post posts that are termed tweets. There is a negative thing about the freedom to write a tweet, namely a tweet that does not contain things that harm other people or community. The problem that arises from this negative thing is to distinguish between hatespeech tweets and abusive tweets. Hate speech and abusive speech are often the same thing. These differences need to be considered because they can have a negative impact on social life. Sentiment analysis is used to distinguish the two things. Sentiment analysis is an implementation of natural language processing which is part of machine learning. The algorithms used in this research are Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Voting Classifier with soft voting type. The estimator for the Voting Classifier is the Support Vector Machine and Random Forest. TF-IDF and N-gram were used as feature extraction. The data used is a tweet dataset that has been labeled neutral, hate speech, and rude speech. Measurement of model accuracy is done by using confusion matrix. The highest accuracy was produced by a combination of Voting Classifier technique with TF-IDF feature extraction and the amount of N-gram was 1 gram, which was 82.57% accuracy.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 103 co-authorship links · 19 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Institut Teknologi Kalimantan
  • Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia
  • Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Endang SugihartiState University of Semarang5
Florentina Yuni AriniState University of Semarang3
Rochmad RochmadAffiliation unknown3
Amin SuyitnoAffiliation unknown3
Alamsyah AlamsyahInstitut Teknologi Kalimantan2
Anggyi Trisnawan PutraAffiliation unknown2
Novanka Agnes SekartajiAffiliation unknown2
Irfan Fajar MuttaqinAffiliation unknown2
Ramadhan Ridho ArrohmanAffiliation unknown2
Dwijanto DwijantoAffiliation unknown2
Putriaji HendikawatiAffiliation unknown2
Mashuri MashuriAffiliation unknown2
Budi PrasetiyoState University of Semarang1
Much Aziz MuslimTun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia1
Jumanto JumantoState University of Semarang1
Rofik RofikState University of Semarang1
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang1
Arka YanitamaState University of Semarang1
Melissa Salma DarmawanState University of Semarang1
Aji SaputraUniversitas PGRI Palembang1
Desy Fitria AstutianingtyasAffiliation unknown1
Syafa Nabilah SyahputraAffiliation unknown1
Athoillah AthoillahAffiliation unknown1
Kholiq BudimanAffiliation unknown1
zaenal abidinAffiliation unknown1
Anggoro Sakti AnindhitoAffiliation unknown1
Fajar SujitoAffiliation unknown1
Anita Wahyu MelindaAffiliation unknown1
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang1
Achmad Wahyu HidayatAffiliation unknown1
Dian Rahman SyahputraAffiliation unknown1
Safit FirmansyahAffiliation unknown1
Anggil AgustaAffiliation unknown1
Fachrizal Ahdy AndoyoAffiliation unknown1
Margareta Ayu RiantikAffiliation unknown1
Hanif Nur CahyaniAffiliation unknown1
Andhika Seno TamtamaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jaist/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Detecting Hate Speech Tweets and Abusive Tweets In Indonesian Languange Using Random Forest and Support Vector Machine with Voting Classifier Technique</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Wijaya, Dandi Indra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Arifudin, Riza</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">



The use of social media has become one of the main things in everyday life. This happens because the features provided make it easy for people to communicate and disseminate information. One of the social media used by many people is Twitter. the main feature of twitter is that its users can post posts that are termed tweets. There is a negative thing about the freedom to write a tweet, namely a tweet that does not contain things that harm other people or community. The problem that arises from this negative thing is to distinguish between hatespeech tweets and abusive tweets. Hate speech and abusive speech are often the same thing. These differences need to be considered because they can have a negative impact on social life. Sentiment analysis is used to distinguish the two things. Sentiment analysis is an implementation of natural language processing which is part of machine learning. The algorithms used in this research are Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Voting Classifier with soft voting type. The estimator for the Voting Classifier is the Support Vector Machine and Random Forest. TF-IDF and N-gram were used as feature extraction. The data used is a tweet dataset that has been labeled neutral, hate speech, and rude speech. Measurement of model accuracy is done by using confusion matrix. The highest accuracy was produced by a combination of Voting Classifier technique with TF-IDF feature extraction and the amount of N-gram was 1 gram, which was 82.57% accuracy.



</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-12-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/59521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jaist.v4i1.59521</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology; Vol 4 No 1 (2022): April; 24-32</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2715-999X</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2714-9714</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jaist.v4i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jaist/article/view/59521/23135</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Advances in Information Systems and Technology</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>