Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Evaluation of Zakat Management Program in The Badan Amil Zakat National of Banten Province

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · pp. 19–28

DOI
10.15294/jrer.v7i1.21056
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2018-03-09
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

In the Islamic religion of zakat one of the pillars required for every Muslim (As'ad, 1980: 01), Hasan (2010) defines that zakat has a special place on Islamic principles, and is the main tool for ensuring social justice in Islam. The purpose of this research is to make the evaluation instrument of zakat management program at Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS) Provinsi Banten fulfilling valid condition and effectiveness assessment test with evaluation of Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model. This research using Mixed Methods is a procedure for collecting, analyzing, and "mixing" quantitative and qualitative methods in a study or series of studies to understand the research problem based on Cresswell & Plano Clark's opinion. Data collection techniques with documentation studies, interviews and questionnaires. The result of the research is the product of evaluation instrument of zakat management program equipped with lattice, validation sheet, and scoring guidance. Analysis of validity test based on validity test of instrument performed by construct validity test by requesting consideration or expert judgment through instrument validation sheet which then analyzed using delphi technique. The result of the validation study is considered very effective to evaluate the zaltat management program at national institution / institution / national agency. It is based on the average score on all aspects of expert judgment reaching 78.3% (very good). Individually every aspect of the effectiveness assessment is between 86% - 93%. Percentage analysis results, the scale of assessment criteria is very appropriate or very good that is between 91% - 100%.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 117 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar
  • Universitas Bhayangkara Surabaya
  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Nina OktarinaAffiliation unknown4
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang4
Murwatiningsih MurwatiningsihAffiliation unknown4
Sugianto SugiantoUniversitas Nahdlatul Ulama Blitar4
Teguh DarsonoAffiliation unknown3
Siti WahyuniAffiliation unknown3
Ahmad SehabuddinAffiliation unknown3
Suharto LinuwihAffiliation unknown3
Amin PujiatiAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad KhafidAffiliation unknown2
Kardoyo KardoyoAffiliation unknown2
Titi PrihatinAffiliation unknown2
Widiyanto WidiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Indri MurniawatyAffiliation unknown2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Wahyu JalaluddinAffiliation unknown2
Maman RachmanAffiliation unknown2
Haryono HaryonoUniversitas Bhayangkara Surabaya2
Tri Joko RaharjoAffiliation unknown2
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Kusumantoro KusumantoroAffiliation unknown2
Etty SoesilowatiAffiliation unknown2
Masfufati AzizahAffiliation unknown2
Nathan HindartoState University of Semarang2
Agus YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang2
I. JunaediAffiliation unknown2
R. JiwaniAffiliation unknown2
Mahardika Prasetya AjiAffiliation unknown2
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang2
Musyarrafah MusyarrafahAffiliation unknown1
Christiana LetheAffiliation unknown1
Edy SuryantoSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad Nukha MurtadloAffiliation unknown1
Angga Pandu WijayaAffiliation unknown1
Syakila MaulidaAffiliation unknown1
Amanda Dewi PuspitaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluation of Zakat Management Program in The Badan Amil Zakat National of Banten Province</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Muammar, Ahmad Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widodo, Joko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sulhadi, Sulhadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In the Islamic religion of zakat one of the pillars required for every Muslim (As'ad, 1980: 01), Hasan (2010) defines that zakat has a special place on Islamic principles, and is the main tool for ensuring social justice in Islam. The purpose of this research is to make the evaluation instrument of zakat management program at Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS) Provinsi Banten fulfilling valid condition and effectiveness assessment test with evaluation of Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model. This research using Mixed Methods is a procedure for collecting, analyzing, and "mixing" quantitative and qualitative methods in a study or series of studies to understand the research problem based on Cresswell &amp;amp; Plano Clark's opinion. Data collection techniques with documentation studies, interviews and questionnaires. The result of the research is the product of evaluation instrument of zakat management program equipped with lattice, validation sheet, and scoring guidance. Analysis of validity test based on validity test of instrument performed by construct validity test by requesting consideration or expert judgment through instrument validation sheet which then analyzed using delphi technique. The result of the validation study is considered very effective to evaluate the zaltat management program at national institution / institution / national agency. It is based on the average score on all aspects of expert judgment reaching 78.3% (very good). Individually every aspect of the effectiveness assessment is between 86% - 93%. Percentage analysis results, the scale of assessment criteria is very appropriate or very good that is between 91% - 100%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-03-09</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/21056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jrer.v7i1.21056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 7 No 1 (2018); 19-28</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jrer.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/21056/10477</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>