Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 8 No. 1 (2019) · pp. 39–47

DOI
10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2019-07-28
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score > 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values > 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item > 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783> 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 97 co-authorship links · 8 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Airlangga
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universiti Teknologi MARA
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Sebelas Maret University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Hartono HartonoAffiliation unknown6
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang4
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Sunarto SunartoAffiliation unknown3
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Totok SumaryantoAffiliation unknown2
Fuadi -Affiliation unknown2
Supriyadi SupriyadiAffiliation unknown2
Masrukan MasrukanState University of Semarang2
Indra Kharisma RaharjanaUniversitas Airlangga1
Halim Wildan AwalurahmanUniversitas Airlangga1
Shukor Sanim Mohd FauziUniversiti Teknologi MARA1
Ine FausayanaUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Ayub M. PadangaranAffiliation unknown1
Nurul InfitahAffiliation unknown1
Riezky AlviansyahAffiliation unknown1
Indah WerdiningsihUniversitas Airlangga1
Alexander Ryan HendartoAffiliation unknown1
Kusmuriyanto KusmuriyantoAffiliation unknown1
Musdalifah MusdalifahAffiliation unknown1
Anik MaghfirohAffiliation unknown1
Trisnani WidowatiAffiliation unknown1
Milda RuliyantiAffiliation unknown1
Ikfina Kamal IdaAffiliation unknown1
Lutfiah KhoirunnisaAffiliation unknown1
Abdul AzizSebelas Maret University1
Athian, Muhammad RahmanAffiliation unknown1
Soesanto SoesantoAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Budhiati VeronicaAffiliation unknown1
Kristina WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Y L SukestiyarnoAffiliation unknown1
HERMAN HERMANAffiliation unknown1
Nurbaiti NurbaitiAffiliation unknown1
Fidia AkmalAffiliation unknown1
Citra Winarni SiahaanAffiliation unknown1
Adiwirman AdiwirmanAffiliation unknown1
Adeel Abdulkarim Fadhl AltuhaishAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Developing Assessment Instruments of Students' Critical Thinking Ability in Trigonometry Material Mathematics Subjects</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Hakim, M. Ikhwanul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kartono, Kartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Lestari, Wahyu</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The preliminary study found that the teacher did not yet have a practical instrument to assess students' critical thinking skills in mathematics. This study aims to develop assessment guidelines for students' critical thinking skills in practical mathematics subjects. The development model refers to the theory of Borg and Gall with 9 steps of development. Small-scale test subjects were conducted on 21 students and a large-scale test was conducted on 90 grade X students of MIPA SMA N 1 Pringgasela. The content validity in this study used the Aiken's V formula and the Ebel formula to look for reliability. Whereas the construct validation with the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model used the AMOS 24 application. The results showed that: (1) the validity of the contents of the instrument, from the aspects of construction, language, and material got the score &amp;gt; 0.3, which means that the instrument was stated to be very valid in content, and very reliable in values &amp;gt; 0.5; (2) contract validity, loading factor per item &amp;gt; 0.3 means that the instrument was valid in contract, the RMSEA value = 0.023 &amp;lt; 0.06, and the GFI value = 0.932 &amp;gt; 0.9, which means that the model developed was very suitable; (3) validation of the items showed that items 5 and 11 were accepted with a slight revision because d &amp;lt; 0.4 and the remaining 10 items were received without revision with d &amp;gt; 0.4, for Alpha Crombach values = 0, 783&amp;gt; 0.5 (very reliable instruments ); (4) practicality test used all math teachers (5 teachers), with an average score of 85.6 means that the instrument was very practical. In conclusion, the instruments developed were very valid, very reliable and very practical. The benefits of the development results were, there were guidelines in carrying out assessment of students' critical thinking skills.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-28</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/31551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jere.v8i1.31551</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 8 No 1 (2019); 39-47</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jere.v8i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/31551/13770</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>