Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Local Wisdom Learning Approach Towards Students Learning Outcomes

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 5 (2019) · pp. 197–205

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Published
2019-07-08
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to; analyze the differences between Gusjigang learning approach and conventional learning on student learning outcomes. The type of research used was a quantitative research method with a nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of all fourth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah TBS Kudus Regency. The sample was selected through a purposive sampling technique, so that class IV B was selected with 23 students as the experimental group and class IV C with 23 students as the control group. The data collection technique uses test techniques, namely the pre-test and post-test questions in the form of multiple choices and brief descriptions. The results obtained in the experimental class, namely the class that in the experimental class that experienced learning with the local wisdom model, Gusjigang gained an increase in learning outcomes by 83 in the high category. The N-Gain results in the control class are students who are taught with conventional learning, students who get low n-gain results are 56%, students who get moderate N-gain results are 44%, and none of the students achieves n-gain results high. Whereas in the experimental class, the students who were taught using Gusjigang's local wisdom-based learning, students who got a low n-gain result of 9%, students who got a moderate n-gain of 56%, and students who achieved a high n-gain of 35 %. This shows that the acquisition of student learning outcomes in the experimental class is better than that of the control class.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 128 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Udayana University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Kusoro SiadiAffiliation unknown5
Woro SumarniAffiliation unknown4
Harjono HarjonoAffiliation unknown3
Sri HaryaniState University of Semarang3
Edy CahyonoAffiliation unknown3
Sri WardaniUdayana University3
Kasmui KasmuiState University of Semarang2
Yosephine Debbie DamayantiAffiliation unknown2
Wisnu SunartoAffiliation unknown2
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang2
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang2
Harjito HarjitoAffiliation unknown2
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang2
Ersanghono KusumoAffiliation unknown2
Melinda Dwi LestariAffiliation unknown2
Nanik WijayatiState University of Semarang2
Ning SetiatiAffiliation unknown2
sunyoto eko nugrohoState University of Semarang2
Aditya MariantiState University of Semarang2
Siti Herlina DewiState University of Semarang1
Eko Budi SusatyaAffiliation unknown1
Norma EralitaAffiliation unknown1
Rr. S.E PujiastutiAffiliation unknown1
M. Aryono AdhiAffiliation unknown1
Rr. Sri Endang PujiastutiAffiliation unknown1
Indah Puji RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Danar SaddamAffiliation unknown1
salipah salipahAffiliation unknown1
Siti Nur SuwaibahAffiliation unknown1
Sari NuryaniAffiliation unknown1
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Min Zahrotil UmamiAffiliation unknown1
Nina FitrianiAffiliation unknown1
Wilis Okti PamungkasAffiliation unknown1
Nanik WijayantiAffiliation unknown1
Meilani Dyah PalupiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi AndrianieAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Local Wisdom Learning Approach Towards Students Learning Outcomes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Febriani, Ema Rahma</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sudarmin, Sudarmin</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Alimah, Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study was to; analyze the differences between Gusjigang learning approach and conventional learning on student learning outcomes. The type of research used was a quantitative research method with a nonequivalent control group design. The population consisted of all fourth-grade students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah TBS Kudus Regency. The sample was selected through a purposive sampling technique, so that class IV B was selected with 23 students as the experimental group and class IV C with 23 students as the control group. The data collection technique uses test techniques, namely the pre-test and post-test questions in the form of multiple choices and brief descriptions. The results obtained in the experimental class, namely the class that in the experimental class that experienced learning with the local wisdom model, Gusjigang gained an increase in learning outcomes by 83 in the high category. The N-Gain results in the control class are students who are taught with conventional learning, students who get low n-gain results are 56%, students who get moderate N-gain results are 44%, and none of the students achieves n-gain results high. Whereas in the experimental class, the students who were taught using Gusjigang's local wisdom-based learning, students who got a low n-gain result of 9%, students who got a moderate n-gain of 56%, and students who achieved a high n-gain of 35 %. This shows that the acquisition of student learning outcomes in the experimental class is better than that of the control class.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/31352</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 5 (2019): June 2019; 197-205</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/31352/13605</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>