Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Effectiveness of The Constructivist Learning Model Using Children Learning In Science (CLIS) Type in Improving Science Learning Outcomes

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 9 No. 5 (2020) · pp. 463–471

DOI
10.15294/jpe.v9i5.42932
ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Published
2020-12-31
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

In primary schools, students are given lessons that can be used to develop their character and various potentials, one of them is science subjects. The CLIS model can be used as an alternative learning model in teaching science because it contains constructivist learning elements that lead to meaningful learning. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the constructivist learning model using Children Learning In Science (CLIS) type in improving student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The sample was taken using a random cluster technique were students of grade V SDN 2 Patikraja as the control class and students of grade V SDN 1 Notog as the experimental class. The data analysis used was a one-sample proportion test, N-Gain analysis, and independent-sample t-test. The results show that the use of the CLIS constructivist learning model is effective in improving student learning outcomes compared to learning with the expository method. This is evidenced by the increase in student scores before and after the implementation of the CLIS constructivist learning model is in the medium category, students in experimental class achieve classical completeness >75%, and the average learning outcomes of the experimental class is higher than the control class, as well as students shows positive responses. So this research can be helpful for the students and the teachers in learning sains.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 155 co-authorship links · 2 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Kanazawa University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Mungin Eddy WibowoAffiliation unknown10
Mungin Eddy WibowoAffiliation unknown9
Awalya AwalyaAffiliation unknown7
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang6
Sri HaryaniAffiliation unknown6
Edy PurwantoAffiliation unknown6
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang5
Sri NurhayatiState University of Semarang5
Sugiyo SugiyoAffiliation unknown5
Sunawan SunawanAffiliation unknown5
Dwi Yuwono Puji SugihartoAffiliation unknown5
Sri Susilogati SumartiState University of Semarang4
Sudarmin SudarminAffiliation unknown4
Sarwi SarwiAffiliation unknown3
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang3
Agung Tri PrasetyaState University of Semarang3
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang3
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang3
Nanik WijayatiState University of Semarang3
Cepi KurniawanState University of Semarang3
Dwi Yuwono Puji SugihartoAffiliation unknown3
Eko NusantoroAffiliation unknown2
Tri SuminarAffiliation unknown2
DYP SugihartoAffiliation unknown2
Muhammad JaparAffiliation unknown2
Haryono HaryonoAffiliation unknown2
Ilham Wirahadi KusumaState University of Semarang1
L. LindawatiAffiliation unknown1
Samuel Budi Wardhana KusumaKanazawa University1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Dwi Norma GupitasariState University of Semarang1
Muhammad MuhammadAffiliation unknown1
Ariana YunusAffiliation unknown1
Fikar Adi Samzul FikarAffiliation unknown1
Abd. Rahman MakkatuoAffiliation unknown1
Fauzan HidayatullahAffiliation unknown1
Kadek Aryana Dwi PutraAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effectiveness of The Constructivist Learning Model Using Children Learning In Science (CLIS) Type in Improving Science Learning Outcomes</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Sari, Dwi Resmi Novita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wardani, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mulawarman, Mulawarman</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">In primary schools, students are given lessons that can be used to develop their character and various potentials, one of them is science subjects. The CLIS model can be used as an alternative learning model in teaching science because it contains constructivist learning elements that lead to meaningful learning. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of the constructivist learning model using Children Learning In Science (CLIS) type in improving student learning outcomes. This study used a quasi-experimental method. The sample was taken using a random cluster technique were students of grade V SDN 2 Patikraja as the control class and students of grade V SDN 1 Notog as the experimental class. The data analysis used was a one-sample proportion test, N-Gain analysis, and independent-sample t-test. The results show that the use of the CLIS constructivist learning model is effective in improving student learning outcomes compared to learning with the expository method. This is evidenced by the increase in student scores before and after the implementation of the CLIS constructivist learning model is in the medium category, students in experimental class achieve classical completeness &amp;gt;75%, and the average learning outcomes of the experimental class is higher than the control class, as well as students shows positive responses. So this research can be helpful for the students and the teachers in learning sains.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-12-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/42932</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpe.v9i5.42932</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 9 No 5 (2020): December 2020; 463-471</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpe.v9i5</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/42932/17489</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>