Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material

Unnes Science Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · pp. 30–39

DOI
10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472
ISSN
2252-6617
Published
2020-02-29
Publisher
Department of Integrated Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in Collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Language
eng

Abstract

Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 140 co-authorship links · 15 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Sriwijaya University
  • University of Szeged
  • Sultan Idris Education University
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Diponegoro University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang7
Prasetyo ListiajiUniversity of Szeged6
Erna Noor SavitriState University of Semarang6
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang5
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang4
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang4
Andin Vita AmaliaAffiliation unknown4
Sudarmin SudarminAffiliation unknown4
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang3
Muhamad TaufiqState University of Semarang3
Fidia FibrianaState University of Semarang2
Rizki Nor AmeliaAffiliation unknown2
Septiko AjiAffiliation unknown2
Luthfi Hanum SaputriAffiliation unknown2
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Irfan Ihza WardanaAffiliation unknown2
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang2
Arka YanitamaState University of Semarang2
Robinson SitepuSriwijaya University1
Fitri Maya PuspitaSriwijaya University1
Elika KurniadiSriwijaya University1
Shintya ApriliyaniSriwijaya University1
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang1
Sri haryaniState University of Semarang1
Shangeetavaani KannapiranSultan Idris Education University1
S W A WibowoAffiliation unknown1
Kasmui KasmuiState University of Semarang1
Mahfud SyahroniAffiliation unknown1
D. W. MaharaniState University of Semarang1
V. A. C. SaputriState University of Semarang1
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang1
A. KurniawatiState University of Semarang1
Andi NurmasUniversitas Halu Oleo1
M RahayuAffiliation unknown1
Melissa Salma DarmawanState University of Semarang1
Luthfiyatul LissaadahState University of Semarang1
Aji SaputraState University of Semarang1
Andhina Putri HeriyantiDiponegoro University1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Yunita, Yunita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Novi Ratna</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&amp;amp;D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Integrated Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in Collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-02-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/usej/article/view/36472</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Science Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2020): February 2020; 30-39</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6617</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/usej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/usej/article/view/36472/16940</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>