Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Open access Journal

Student Errors in Solving Number Patterns, Sequences, and Series HOTS Types Based on Newman's Theory in Terms of Gender

Kesalahan Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Pola Bilangan, Barisan, dan Deret Tipe HOTS Berdasarkan Teori Newman Ditinjau dari Gender

Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 170–179

DOI
10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.15611
ISSN
2580-0779, 2088-2157
Published
2022-08-31
Publisher
Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi
Language
en
License
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0

Abstract

English

This study aims to analyze the errors of students with HOTS abilities at high, medium and low levels and identify student errors in solving HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) type questions in terms of gender. This type of research is qualitative with a case study approach. The research subjects were selected 3 male students and 3 female students, each of which the HOTS ability level was high, medium and low consisting of 2 students. Data collection techniques used HOTS-type tests and interviews. The analytical framework was developed based on Newman's theory of error categories. The data obtained were tested for validity through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability tests. The results showed several differences in the types and percentages of errors made by male and female subjects in solving HOTS-type questions. The biggest mistakes made by both genders in the material of number patterns, sequences, and series are misunderstandings of 33.33%, followed by errors in determining the final answer of 23.02%, transformation errors of 22.22%, errors in the completion process of 20.63%, and finally, reading errors of 0.79%. It can be seen that the female gender makes more mistakes by 57.14% compared to the male gender by 41.86%.

Indonesian

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis kesalahan-kesalahan siswa yang kemampuan HOTS pada tingkat tinggi, sedang dan rendah serta mengidentifikasi kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) ditinjau dari gender. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Subjek penelitian dipilih 3 siswa laki-laki dan 3 siswa perempuan, yang masing-masing tingkat kemampuan HOTS tinggi, sedang dan rendah terdiri dari 2 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes bertipe HOTS dan wawancara. Kerangka analisis dikembangkan berdasarkan kategori kesalahan teori Newman. Data yang diperoleh diuji keabsahannya melalui uji kredibilitas, transferability, dependability, dan konfirmability. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat beberapa perbedaan jenis dan besar persentase kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh subjek laki-laki dan perempuan dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe HOTS. Kesalahan terbesar yang dilakukan kedua gender pada materi pola bilangan, barisan, dan deret yaitu kesalahan memahami sebesar 33,33%, kemudian diikuti kesalahan penentuan jawaban akhir sebesar 23,02%, kesalahan transformasi sebesar 22,22%, kesalahan proses penyelesaian sebesar 20,63%, dan terakhir kesalahan membaca sekitar 0,79%. Terlihat bahwa gender perempuan lebih banyak melakukan kesalahan sebesar 57.14% dibandingkan dengan gender laki-laki sebesar 41.86%.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 117 co-authorship links · 38 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Lambung Mangkurat University
  • Tadulako University
  • State University of Semarang
  • IKIP Siliwangi
  • State University of Medan
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dadang JuandiIndonesia University of Education6
Didi SuryadiIndonesia University of Education5
Dadan DasariIndonesia University of Education3
Sufyani PrabawantoAffiliation unknown3
Eritha Dewi FebriantyAffiliation unknown3
Ikbal PaujiAffiliation unknown3
Yaya Sukjaya KusumahIndonesia University of Education3
Delsika Pramata SariLambung Mangkurat University2
Jarnawi Afgani DahlanIndonesia University of Education2
Wahyudin WahyudinTadulako University2
Al JupriIndonesia University of Education2
Aan HasanahIndonesia University of Education2
Bambang Eko SusiloState University of Semarang2
Edi SupriyadiIndonesia University of Education2
Jozua SabandarIndonesia University of Education2
Turmudi TurmudiIndonesia University of Education2
Widya KusumaningsihUniversitas PGRI Semarang2
Al JupriAffiliation unknown2
Elah NurlaelahAffiliation unknown2
Adi NurjamanIndonesia University of Education1
Wahyu HidayatIKIP Siliwangi1
Edy SuryaState University of Medan1
Zulkardi ZulkardiSriwijaya University1
Bonita HirzaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Palembang1
Damianus Dao SamoUniversity of Nusa Cendana1
Bana G. KartasasmitaIndonesia University of Education1
Rizky RosjanuardiIndonesia University of Education1
Rina OktaviyanthiSerang Raya University1
Kurniati KurniatiPakuan University1
Aloisius Loka SonUniversity of Timor1
Siti FatimahIndonesia University of Education1
TurmudiAffiliation unknown1
Puri PramudianiIndonesia University of Education1
Maarten DolkUtrecht University1
Suhendra SuhendraAffiliation unknown1
Syifa MardliyahAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/index.php/edumatica/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en">Student Errors in Solving Number Patterns, Sequences, and Series HOTS Types Based on Newman's Theory in Terms of Gender</dc:title>
	<dc:title xml:lang="id">Kesalahan Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Pola Bilangan, Barisan, dan Deret Tipe HOTS Berdasarkan Teori Newman Ditinjau dari Gender</dc:title>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Siagian, Qania Agustika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Herman, Tatang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Darhim, Darhim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="en">Khairunnisa, Khairunnisa</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Siagian, Qania Agustika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Herman, Tatang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Darhim, Darhim</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator xml:lang="id">Khairunnisa, Khairunnisa</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">gender</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">HOTS</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="id">teori Newman</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">gender</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">HOTS</dc:subject>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en">Newman's theory</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en">This study aims to analyze the errors of students with HOTS abilities at high, medium and low levels and identify student errors in solving HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) type questions in terms of gender. This type of research is qualitative with a case study approach. The research subjects were selected 3 male students and 3 female students, each of which the HOTS ability level was high, medium and low consisting of 2 students. Data collection techniques used HOTS-type tests and interviews. The analytical framework was developed based on Newman's theory of error categories. The data obtained were tested for validity through credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability tests. The results showed several differences in the types and percentages of errors made by male and female subjects in solving HOTS-type questions. The biggest mistakes made by both genders in the material of number patterns, sequences, and series are misunderstandings of 33.33%, followed by errors in determining the final answer of 23.02%, transformation errors of 22.22%, errors in the completion process of 20.63%, and finally, reading errors of 0.79%. It can be seen that the female gender makes more mistakes by 57.14% compared to the male gender by 41.86%.</dc:description>
	<dc:description xml:lang="id">Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis kesalahan-kesalahan siswa yang kemampuan HOTS pada tingkat tinggi, sedang dan rendah serta mengidentifikasi kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skill) ditinjau dari gender. Jenis penelitian yang dilakukan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Subjek penelitian dipilih 3 siswa laki-laki dan 3 siswa perempuan, yang masing-masing tingkat kemampuan HOTS tinggi, sedang dan rendah terdiri dari 2 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes bertipe HOTS dan wawancara. Kerangka analisis dikembangkan berdasarkan kategori kesalahan teori Newman. Data yang diperoleh diuji keabsahannya melalui uji kredibilitas, transferability, dependability, dan konfirmability. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat beberapa perbedaan jenis dan besar persentase kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh subjek laki-laki dan perempuan dalam menyelesaikan soal tipe HOTS. Kesalahan terbesar yang dilakukan kedua gender pada materi pola bilangan, barisan, dan deret yaitu kesalahan memahami sebesar 33,33%, kemudian diikuti kesalahan penentuan jawaban akhir sebesar 23,02%, kesalahan transformasi sebesar 22,22%, kesalahan proses penyelesaian sebesar 20,63%, dan terakhir kesalahan membaca sekitar 0,79%. Terlihat bahwa gender perempuan lebih banyak melakukan kesalahan sebesar 57.14% dibandingkan dengan gender laki-laki sebesar 41.86%.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en">Department of Mathematics Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Jambi</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2022-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/15611</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.15611</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (August 2022); 170-179</dc:source>
	<dc:source xml:lang="id">Edumatica : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; Vol 12 No 2 (2022): Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika; 170-179</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2580-0779</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2088-2157</dc:source>
	<dc:language>en</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/15611/14118</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">Copyright (c) 2022 Qania Agustika Siagian, Tatang Herman, Darhim Darhim, Khairunnisa Khairunnisa</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>