Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

COMPARING MODEL-BUILDING PROCESS: A MODEL PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS USED IN INTERPRETING STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL THINKING

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019) · hlm. 171–184

DOI
10.22342/jme.10.2.7351.171-184
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2019-05-28
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

Mathematical thinking is an important aspect of mathematics education and, therefore, also needs to be understood by prospective teachers. Prospective teachers should have the ability to analyze and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Comparing model is one of the interpretation models from Wilson, Lee, and Hollebrands. This article will describe the prospective teacher used the model of the building process in interpretation students' mathematical thinking. Subjects selected by considering them in following the students’ strategies in solving the Building Construction Problem. Comparing model is a model of interpretation in which a person interprets student thinking based on student work. There are two types comparing model building process prospective teacher use in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking ie. comparing work and comparing knowledge. In comparing works, prospective teachers use an external representation rubric. This is used to analyze student activities in order to provide an interpretation that is comparing the work of students with their own work. In comparing knowledge, prospective teachers use internal representation rubrics to provide interpretation by comparing the students' work with their knowledge or thought.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 114 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 51 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Malang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo
  • Universitas PGRI Madiun
  • Universitas Jember
  • University of Malaya
  • Universitas Pattimura
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lathiful AnwarState University of Malang7
Wasilatul MurtafiahUniversitas PGRI Madiun5
Subanji SubanjiState University of Malang4
Dian KurniatiUniversitas Jember3
SUDIRMAN SUDIRMANState University of Malang3
Firdha Mahrifatul ZanaState University of Malang3
I Nengah PartaState University of Malang3
Tjang Daniel ChandraState University of Malang3
Heri RetnawatiYogyakarta State University2
Hutkemri ZulnaidiUniversity of Malaya2
Susana LabuemUniversitas Pattimura2
I Made SulandraState University of Malang2
Yerizon YerizonUniversitas Negeri Padang2
I Made ArnawaAndalas University2
Toto NusantaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Anwar AnwarUniversitas Gadjah Mada2
Ipung YuwonoState University of Malang2
Dwiyana DwiyanaState University of Malang2
Hery SusantoState University of Malang2
Makbul MuksarAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ali MahmudiYogyakarta State University1
Elah NuerlaelahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ika SantiaState University of Malang1
Akbar SutawidjadjaState University of Malang1
Sudirman SudirmanState University of Malang1
Sugiman SugimanYogyakarta State University1
Wahyu SetyaningrumYogyakarta State University1
Kazuhiro AoyamaAichi University of Education1
Yayan Eryk SetiawanUniversitas Islam Malang1
Sisworo SisworoState University of Malang1
Muhammad IrfanState University of Makassar1
Christine Wulandari SuryaningrumState University of Malang1
Yoga Dwi Windy Kusuma NingtyasUniversitas Muhammadiyah Jember1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>COMPARING MODEL-BUILDING PROCESS: A MODEL PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS USED IN INTERPRETING STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL THINKING</dc:title><dc:creator>Sapti, Mujiyem</dc:creator><dc:creator>Purwanto, Purwanto</dc:creator><dc:creator>Irawan, Edy Bambang</dc:creator><dc:creator>As'ari, Abdur Rahman</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sa'dijah, Cholis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Susiswo, Susiswo</dc:creator><dc:creator>Wijaya, Ariyadi</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Mathematical thinking is an important aspect of mathematics education and, therefore, also needs to be understood by prospective teachers. Prospective teachers should have the ability to analyze and interpret students’ mathematical thinking. Comparing model is one of the interpretation models from Wilson, Lee, and Hollebrands. This article will describe the prospective teacher used the model of the building process in interpretation students' mathematical thinking. Subjects selected by considering them in following the students’ strategies in solving the Building Construction Problem. Comparing model is a model of interpretation in which a person interprets student thinking based on student work. There are two types comparing model building process prospective teacher use in interpreting students’ mathematical thinking ie. comparing work and comparing knowledge. In comparing works, prospective teachers use an external representation rubric. This is used to analyze student activities in order to provide an interpretation that is comparing the work of students with their own work. In comparing knowledge, prospective teachers use internal representation rubrics to provide interpretation by comparing the students' work with their knowledge or thought.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2019-05-28</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.7351.171-184</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.10.2.7351.171-184</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 10 No 2 (2019); 171-184</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/7351/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>