Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS’ ABDUCTIVE REASONING IN SOLVING ALGEBRA PROBLEMS

Journal on Mathematics Education · Vol. 11 No. 3 (2020) · hlm. 347–362

DOI
10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362
ISSN
2407-0610, 2087-8885
Terbit
2020-08-29
Penerbit
Indonesian Mathematical Society
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Abstrak

When students solve an algebra problem, students try to deduce the facts in the problem. This step is imperative, students can draw conclusions from the facts and devise a plan to solve the problem. Drawing conclusions from facts is called reasoning. Some kinds of reasoning are deductive, inductive, and abductive. This article explores the characteristics of some types of abductive reasoning used by mathematics education students in problem-solving related to using facts on the problems. Fifty-eight students were asked to solve an algebra problem. It was found that the student’s solutions could be grouped into four types of abductive reasoning. From each group, one student was interviewed to have more details on the types. First, the creative conjectures type, the students can solve the problems and develop new ideas related to the problems; second, fact optimization type, the students make conjecture of the answer, then confirm it by deductive reasoning; third, factual error type, students use facts outside of the problems to solve it, but the facts are wrong; and fourth, mistaken fact type, the students assume the questionable thing as a given fact. Therefore, teachers should encourage the students to use creative conjectures and fact optimization when learning mathematics.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 111 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 35 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Malang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas PGRI Madiun
  • Muhammadiyah University Purwokerto
  • University of Malaya
  • Universitas Pattimura
  • Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Lathiful AnwarState University of Malang7
Muhamad Galang IsnawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Naif Mastoor AlsulamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Ramadhita RamadhitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Syabbul BachriAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Susiswo SusiswoState University of Malang4
Wasilatul MurtafiahUniversitas PGRI Madiun3
Abdur Rahman As’ariState University of Malang3
Purwanto PurwantoState University of Malang3
Sukoriyanto SukoriyantoState University of Malang3
Hutkemri ZulnaidiUniversity of Malaya2
Firdha Mahrifatul ZanaState University of Malang2
I Nengah PartaState University of Malang2
Susana LabuemUniversitas Pattimura2
I Made SulandraState University of Malang2
Yerizon YerizonUniversitas Negeri Padang2
I Made ArnawaAndalas University2
Wanda Nugroho YanuartoMuhammadiyah University Purwokerto2
Ebenezer BonyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yusnaeni YusnaeniAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Purwanto PurwantoCenderawasih University2
Toto NusantaraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Tjang Daniel ChandraState University of Malang1
Ariyadi WijayaYogyakarta State University1
Edy Bambang IrawanState University of Malang1
Mujiyem SaptiUniversitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo1
Ika SantiaState University of Malang1
Akbar SutawidjadjaState University of Malang1
Sudirman SudirmanState University of Malang1
Dian KurniatiUniversitas Jember1
A. PurwantoYogyakarta State University1
didik purwiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
B A SetionoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Muh. RusmayadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Samsuriadi SamsuriadiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Jenisus O. DejarloAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2407-0610/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS’ ABDUCTIVE REASONING IN SOLVING ALGEBRA PROBLEMS</dc:title><dc:creator>Hidayah, Indriati Nurul</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sa'dijah, Cholis</dc:creator><dc:creator>Subanji, Subanji</dc:creator><dc:creator>Sudirman, Sudirman</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;When students solve an algebra problem, students try to deduce the facts in the problem. This step is imperative, students can draw conclusions from the facts and devise a plan to solve the problem. Drawing conclusions from facts is called reasoning. Some kinds of reasoning are deductive, inductive, and abductive. This article explores the characteristics of some types of abductive reasoning used by mathematics education students in problem-solving related to using facts on the problems. Fifty-eight students were asked to solve an algebra problem. It was found that the student’s solutions could be grouped into four types of abductive reasoning. From each group, one student was interviewed to have more details on the types. First, the creative conjectures type, the students can solve the problems and develop new ideas related to the problems; second, fact optimization type, the students make conjecture of the answer, then confirm it by deductive reasoning; third, factual error type, students use facts outside of the problems to solve it, but the facts are wrong; and fourth,  mistaken fact type, the students assume the questionable thing as a given fact. Therefore, teachers should encourage the students to use creative conjectures and fact optimization when learning mathematics.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>Indonesian Mathematical Society</dc:publisher><dc:date>2020-08-29</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22342/jme.11.3.11869.347-362</dc:identifier><dc:source>Journal on Mathematics Education; Vol 11 No 3 (2020); 347-362</dc:source><dc:source>2407-0610</dc:source><dc:source>2087-8885</dc:source><dc:relation>https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/viewFile/11869/pdf</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>