Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Designing and enacting mathematics lessons: Insights from pre-service teachers’ learning through project-based learning and lesson study

Infinity Journal · Vol. 15 No. 4 (2026) · hlm. 993–1010

DOI
10.22460/infinity.v15i4.p993-1010
ISSN
2460-9285, 2089-6867
Terbit
2026-09-14
Penerbit
IKIP Siliwangi Bandung
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Abstrak

Bridging lesson design and instructional enactment remains a challenge in mathematics teacher education. This qualitative case study explored how Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and lesson study supported pre-service mathematics teachers (PSTs) in addressing this challenge. PjBL provided the macro-pedagogical architecture for a seven-week collaborative project, while LS structured the micro-cycles of Plan, Do, See, and Redesign. Participants were 13 third-year PSTs enrolled in an undergraduate Mathematics Education program and taking an Elementary Mathematics Instruction course at an Indonesian university. Organized into three groups, they selected an elementary mathematics topic, designed a two-meeting lesson sequence, and completed two lesson study cycles through peer teaching. Data consisted of lesson designs and semi-structured group interviews and were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that participants engaged in pedagogical reasoning, designed tasks intended to promote mathematical reasoning and communication, considered simulated learner responses, and used reflection to redesign their lessons. However, interview data revealed instances of reverting to direct explanation when simulated learners hesitated or required additional time. These findings identify a design–enactment discontinuity in which the capacity to construct student-centered lessons did not automatically translate into responsive enactment. The study suggests that combining sustained project work with iterative professional inquiry can provide a useful structure for lesson design, but PSTs also require repeated and scaffolded opportunities to rehearse responding to learner thinking.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 80 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 28 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • University of Malaya
  • State University of Malang
  • Bina Bangsa Getsempena University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Indonesia University of Education
  • Riau University
  • Universiti Sains Malaysia
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Mulia PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Lathiful AnwarState University of Malang2
Cholis Sa’dijahState University of Malang2
Cut KhairunnisakUniversitas Syiah Kuala2
Arif HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Yusuf HartonoSriwijaya University1
Zulkardi ZulkardiSriwijaya University1
MuzakkirAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rose Amnah Abd RaufAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SusiswoState University of Malang1
Firdha Mahrifatul ZanaState University of Malang1
Mulia PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
UsmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Safrina JunitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Chan Choon TakUniversity of Malaya1
Kwan Eu LeongUniversity of Malaya1
Arif Sapta MandalaState University of Malang1
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang1
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang1
Tiara Dwi WulandariState University of Semarang1
Nadia Eka ArdhaniState University of Semarang1
Syam HardwisIndonesia University of Education1
Mustika FitriIndonesia University of Education1
- Femia RahmahsariIndonesia University of Education1
Hilmi ApriadyIndonesia University of Education1
Elfis SuantoRiau University1
Efni RiantiRiau University1
Armis ArmisRiau University1
Fitriati FitriatiBina Bangsa Getsempena University1
Rahmah JoharUniversitas Syiah Kuala1
Hidayah Mohd FadzilUniversity of Malaya1
Nofouz MafarjaUniversity of Malaya1
Salmiza SalehUniversiti Sains Malaysia1
Siti Ainor Mohd YatimUniversiti Sains Malaysia1
Siti Seri Kartini Mohd YatimUniversiti Sains Malaysia1
Tie-Seng TeUniversity of Malaya1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Data ini berasal dari Crossref (yang disetorkan penerbit), karena endpoint OAI-PMH milik jurnal tidak dapat di-harvest.

Sumber metadata: Crossref API (cadangan, berdasarkan ISSN) https://api.crossref.org/journals/2460-9285/works, pertama di-harvest 28 Okt 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata sebagai oai_dc, dikonversi dari Crossref
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/"><dc:title>Designing and enacting mathematics lessons: Insights from pre-service teachers’ learning through project-based learning and lesson study</dc:title><dc:creator>Fitriati, Fitriati</dc:creator><dc:creator>Zulnaidi, Hutkemri</dc:creator><dc:creator>Novita, Rita</dc:creator><dc:creator>Salmina, Mik</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;jats:p&gt;Bridging lesson design and instructional enactment remains a challenge in mathematics teacher education. This qualitative case study explored how Project-Based Learning (PjBL) and lesson study supported pre-service mathematics teachers (PSTs) in addressing this challenge. PjBL provided the macro-pedagogical architecture for a seven-week collaborative project, while LS structured the micro-cycles of Plan, Do, See, and Redesign. Participants were 13 third-year PSTs enrolled in an undergraduate Mathematics Education program and taking an Elementary Mathematics Instruction course at an Indonesian university. Organized into three groups, they selected an elementary mathematics topic, designed a two-meeting lesson sequence, and completed two lesson study cycles through peer teaching. Data consisted of lesson designs and semi-structured group interviews and were analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that participants engaged in pedagogical reasoning, designed tasks intended to promote mathematical reasoning and communication, considered simulated learner responses, and used reflection to redesign their lessons. However, interview data revealed instances of reverting to direct explanation when simulated learners hesitated or required additional time. These findings identify a design–enactment discontinuity in which the capacity to construct student-centered lessons did not automatically translate into responsive enactment. The study suggests that combining sustained project work with iterative professional inquiry can provide a useful structure for lesson design, but PSTs also require repeated and scaffolded opportunities to rehearse responding to learner thinking.&lt;/jats:p&gt;</dc:description><dc:publisher>IKIP Siliwangi Bandung</dc:publisher><dc:date>2026-09-14</dc:date><dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type><dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format><dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v15i4.p993-1010</dc:identifier><dc:identifier>10.22460/infinity.v15i4.p993-1010</dc:identifier><dc:source>Infinity Journal; Vol 15 No 4 (2026); 993-1010</dc:source><dc:source>2460-9285</dc:source><dc:source>2089-6867</dc:source><dc:relation>https://e-journal.stkipsiliwangi.ac.id/index.php/infinity/article/download/7312/2573</dc:relation><dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</dc:rights></oai_dc:dc>