Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Akses terbuka Jurnal SINTA 1

Blended learning model towards vocational students’ learning outcomes: A scoping review

International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023) · hlm. 205–215

DOI
10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22986
ISSN
2620-5440, 2252-8822
Terbit
2023-03-01
Penerbit
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Bahasa
eng
Lisensi
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0

Abstrak

The learning characteristic in the 21st century is the availability of information anywhere and anytime. Blended learning (BL) became the most widely used learning strategy in vocational education. However, the problem is the effectiveness of BL on student outcomes. This scoping review provides an overview of the implementation of the BL model on vocational students. The research questions in this review were: i) What type of BL was taken?; ii) How did the BL model works?; and iii) What was improved in student learning outcomes? The research method adopted the scoping review from Arksey & Markey. From the beginning, the research article data was taken from the Scopus database. The article selection using the PRISMA method obtained 32 articles from 4,298 articles. The results of the review showed that there were three types of BL models. The three types of BL were: i) The flipped classroom model; ii) The station-rotation model; and iii) The self-blend model. BL syntax that teachers most favored in nine ways, but mainly with the syntax: “Face-to-face (F2F) finished, after that online learning for enrichment”. Meanwhile, most of the articles improved learning outcomes in the cognitive domain.

Kata kunci

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 107 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 27 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • National University of Malaysia
  • Tanjungpura University
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta
  • Organisasi lain
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Suranto SurantoSebelas Maret University3
Idam Ragil Widianto AtmojoSebelas Maret University2
Riezky Maya ProbosariSebelas Maret University2
Ashadi AshadiSebelas Maret University2
S. SutiknoState University of Semarang2
Sri WidoretnoSebelas Maret University2
Sri DwiastutiSebelas Maret University2
Prabang SetyonoSebelas Maret University2
Afandi AfandiTanjungpura University2
Nunuk SuryaniSebelas Maret University2
Roy ArdiansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Yuniasih SaputriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roslinawati Mohd RoslanUniversiti Brunei Darussalam1
Lilia HalimNational University of Malaysia1
Dini Yuli SaputriSebelas Maret University1
R. EtvianaSebelas Maret University1
Bertha WikaraSebelas Maret University1
S. SutarnoSebelas Maret University1
Baskoro Adi PrayitnoSebelas Maret University1
P. ParminState University of Semarang1
Fidia FibrianaState University of Semarang1
Annisa Nur KhasanahSebelas Maret University1
Ade Cyntia PritasariSebelas Maret University1
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang1
Zuhdan Kun PrasetyoYogyakarta State University1
Kartika Chrysti SuryandariSebelas Maret University1
Sentot Budi RahardjoSebelas Maret University1
Siti FatimahSunan Kalijaga State Islamic University Yogyakarta1
Ari SusilowatiSebelas Maret University1
Artini PangastutiSebelas Maret University1
Baraka Stewart MkumbeSebelas Maret University1
Ralf GreinerMax Rubner Institut1
Sunarto SunartoSebelas Maret University1
Widhi HimawanSebelas Maret University1
Natasha NancyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sovia WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) http://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/oai, pertama di-harvest 8 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Blended learning model towards vocational students’ learning outcomes: A scoping review</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Basori, Basori</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sajidan, Sajidan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Akhyar, Muhammad</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wiranto, Wiranto</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">Blended learning; Flipped classroom; Learning outcomes; Self-blend; Station-rotation</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The learning characteristic in the 21st century is the availability of information anywhere and anytime. Blended learning (BL) became the most widely used learning strategy in vocational education. However, the problem is the effectiveness of BL on student outcomes. This scoping review provides an overview of the implementation of the BL model on vocational students. The research questions in this review were: i) What type of BL was taken?; ii) How did the BL model works?; and iii) What was improved in student learning outcomes? The research method adopted the scoping review from Arksey &amp;amp; Markey. From the beginning, the research article data was taken from the Scopus database. The article selection using the PRISMA method obtained 32 articles from 4,298 articles. The results of the review showed that there were three types of BL models. The three types of BL were: i) The flipped classroom model; ii) The station-rotation model; and iii) The self-blend model. BL syntax that teachers most favored in nine ways, but mainly with the syntax: “Face-to-face (F2F) finished, after that online learning for enrichment”. Meanwhile, most of the articles improved learning outcomes in the cognitive domain.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2023-03-01</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US"></dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/22986</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.11591/ijere.v12i1.22986</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE); Vol 12, No 1: March 2023; 205-215</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2620-5440</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-8822</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.11591/ijere.v12i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://ijere.iaescore.com/index.php/IJERE/article/view/22986/13516</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science</dc:rights>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>