Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal SINTA 1

Implementation of 5E Plus Learning Model on Energy Subject Matter to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills

Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 11 No. 2 (2022) · pp. 237–245

DOI
10.15294/jpii.v11i2.30567
ISSN
2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published
2022-06-30
Publisher
Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language
eng

Abstract

Argumentation skills consist of 2 elements: skills to construct arguments and implement them. However, some studies show that students’ argumentation skills were low. This study proposed the 5E Plus learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills. The model consists of an element named Enliven and six syntaxes: Orientation, Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model in improving students’ argumentation skills. This study used Energy subject matter (which consisted of 3 topics, Mechanical, Heat, and Electrical Energy). The study’s sample consisted of 40 1st semester college students from the Natural Science department and was taken randomly. We used One-Group Pretest-Posttest as a research design and collected data using an argumentation skills test. The data was examined using an Independent sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model. The results were: 1) the 5E Plus learning model was effective for improving students’ argumentation skills, 2) All components of students’ argumentation skills were successfully improved, which warrant experienced the highest improvement, 3) Students’ argumentation skills in all three topics were successfully improved, which in Mechanical Energy topic the skills experienced the highest improvement.

Keywords

Collaboration network of the authors

33 authors · 87 co-authorship links · 27 across different organisations

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Sebelas Maret University
  • State University of Semarang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universiti Brunei Darussalam
  • National University of Malaysia
  • University of Malaya
  • Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng
  • Other organisations
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Idam Ragil Widianto AtmojoSebelas Maret University3
Riezky Maya ProbosariSebelas Maret University3
Ashadi AshadiSebelas Maret University3
S. SutiknoState University of Semarang2
Sri WidoretnoSebelas Maret University2
Sri DwiastutiSebelas Maret University2
Dini Yuli SaputriSebelas Maret University2
R. EtvianaSebelas Maret University2
Baskoro Adi PrayitnoSebelas Maret University2
Roy ArdiansyahAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Yuniasih SaputriAffiliation unknown1
Roslinawati Mohd RoslanUniversiti Brunei Darussalam1
Lilia HalimNational University of Malaysia1
Sarwanto SarwantoSebelas Maret University1
Wahyuni PurnamiSebelas Maret University1
Bambang SumintonoUniversity of Malaya1
Y. WahyuUniversitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng1
Edi IstiyonoYogyakarta State University1
Siti Salina MustakimUniversiti Putra Malaysia1
Widihastuti WidihastutiYogyakarta State University1
Taufiq Satria MuktiAffiliation unknown1
Afandi AfandiSebelas Maret University1
Muhammad AkhyarSebelas Maret University1
Nunuk SuryaniSebelas Maret University1
P. ParminState University of Semarang1
Fidia FibrianaState University of Semarang1
Annisa Nur KhasanahSebelas Maret University1
Ade Cyntia PritasariSebelas Maret University1
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai, first harvested 29 Okt 2026, last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Implementation of 5E Plus Learning Model on Energy Subject Matter to Improve Students’ Argumentation Skills</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Wikara, B.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutarno, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suranto, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sajidan, S.</dc:creator>
	<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">5E Plus learning model; argumentation skills; energy subject matter</dc:subject>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Argumentation skills consist of 2 elements: skills to construct arguments and implement them. However, some studies show that students’ argumentation skills were low. This study proposed the 5E Plus learning model to improve students’ argumentation skills. The model consists of an element named Enliven and six syntaxes: Orientation, Engagement, Exploration, Explanation, Elaboration, and Evaluation. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model in improving students’ argumentation skills. This study used Energy subject matter (which consisted of 3 topics, Mechanical, Heat, and Electrical Energy). The study’s sample consisted of 40 1st semester college students from the Natural Science department and was taken randomly. We used One-Group Pretest-Posttest as a research design and collected data using an argumentation skills test. The data was examined using an Independent sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of the 5E Plus learning model. The results were: 1) the 5E Plus learning model was effective for improving students’ argumentation skills, 2) All components of students’ argumentation skills were successfully improved, which warrant experienced the highest improvement, 3) Students’ argumentation skills in all three topics were successfully improved, which in Mechanical Energy topic the skills experienced the highest improvement. </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
	<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
	<dc:date>2022-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/30567</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v11i2.30567</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 11, No 2 (2022): June 2022; 237-245</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v11i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/30567/13148</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/30567/9507</dc:relation>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/30567/9508</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>