Jurnal
SINTA 1
Item Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Scientific Group Inquiry Learning (SGIL) Model
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 8 No. 4 (2019) · pp. 538–546
ISSN 2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published 2019-12-31
Publisher Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language eng
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the problem set items to get information and feedback on critical thinking skills tests. This research develops a SGIL model that can improve students’ critical thinking learning. This study uses a research and development design to develop the SGIL model. The SGIL model is proven to be able to improve the critical understanding of PGSD students. The syntax of SGIL consists of 6 steps, namely: (1) discussion of problems and topic selection; (2) research planning; (3) implementation; (4) data integration; (5) analysis and synthesis; and (6) conclusions and communication. The participants were 114 Elementary Teacher Education Program (PGSD) students who were selected by using a random sampling technique. This research was conducted in 3 sample universities. The data of SGIL model effectiveness was measured by using instrument of critical thinking skills. This instrument has been analyzed for its validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination item. Tests to obtain data were carried out for 90 minutes. The instrument was calculated by using analysis of Quest and Lisrel.
Collaboration network of the authors
31 authors ·
69 co-authorship links
· 18 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Sebelas Maret University Indonesia University of Education State University of Malang Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara Charles Darwin University Indonesia Open University University of Technology Malaysia Other organisations Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai,
first harvested 29 Okt 2026,
last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Item Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Scientific Group Inquiry Learning (SGIL) Model</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Wijayanti, M. D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rahardjo, S. B.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Saputro, S.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Mulyani, S.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">critical thinking skills, PGSD, SGIL</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The purpose of this study is to analyze the problem set items to get information and feedback on critical thinking skills tests. This research develops a SGIL model that can improve students’ critical thinking learning. This study uses a research and development design to develop the SGIL model. The SGIL model is proven to be able to improve the critical understanding of PGSD students. The syntax of SGIL consists of 6 steps, namely: (1) discussion of problems and topic selection; (2) research planning; (3) implementation; (4) data integration; (5) analysis and synthesis; and (6) conclusions and communication. The participants were 114 Elementary Teacher Education Program (PGSD) students who were selected by using a random sampling technique. This research was conducted in 3 sample universities. The data of SGIL model effectiveness was measured by using instrument of critical thinking skills. This instrument has been analyzed for its validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and discrimination item. Tests to obtain data were carried out for 90 minutes. The instrument was calculated by using analysis of Quest and Lisrel.</dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US">Sebelas Maret University</dc:contributor>
<dc:date>2019-12-31</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/20794</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20794</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 8, No 4 (2019): December 2019; 538-546</dc:source>
<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v8i4</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/123456</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/20794/9970</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/20794/4564</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/20794/4950</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/20794/4951</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/20794/4952</dc:relation>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/downloadSuppFile/20794/4969</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Indexed
via DOI
10 citations
Crossref
Indexed
via DOI
3 citations
Counts as reported by each index on 29 Okt 2026; indexes count citations differently.
OpenAlex also lists this work in: crossref, doaj.
Cite this article
APA 7
Wijayanti, M. D., Rahardjo, S. B., Saputro, S., & Mulyani, S. (2019). Item Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Scientific Group Inquiry Learning (SGIL) Model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20794
Copy
IEEE
M. D. Wijayanti, S. B. Rahardjo, S. Saputro, and S. Mulyani, “Item Analysis of Critical Thinking Skills Instrument to Measure Effectiveness of Scientific Group Inquiry Learning (SGIL) Model,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 538–546, 2019, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v8i4.20794.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.