Open access
Jurnal
SINTA 1
COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING THROUGH MODEL OF GUIDED DISCOVERY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia · Vol. 5 No. 1 (2016) · pp. 31–37
ISSN 2089-4392, 2339-1286
Published 2016-04-18
Publisher Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)
Language eng
Abstract
This study aims to describe the comparison of students’ scientific literacy improvement in integrated science learning through guided dicovery and problem based learning models. The subjects were 8th grade students of State Junior High Schools in Bandung. This research design was quasi-experimental with non randomaized static group pretest-posttest design. The instrument used in this study was multiple choice test and attitude scale. The result shows that the improvement of scientific literacy achievement of students who learned integrated science through guided discovery and problem based learning models did not differ significantly. Integrated science learning through guided disovery models can improve student literacy achievement with the gain of 0.37 (medium category), while by using problem based learning model can improve scientific literacy with the gain of 0.41 (medium category). It can be concluded that the both models of guided discovery and problem based learning can improve students' science literacy.
Collaboration network of the authors
14 authors ·
44 co-authorship links
· 27 across different organisations
Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.
Pakuan University Indonesia University of Education The University of Queensland National Research and Innovation Agency Shizuoka University Hiroshima University Affiliation unknown
Different organisations
Same organisation
Affiliation unknown
Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.
Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii/oai,
first harvested 29 Okt 2026,
last seen 29 Okt 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING THROUGH MODEL OF GUIDED DISCOVERY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING</dc:title>
<dc:creator>Ardianto, D.</dc:creator>
<dc:creator>Rubini, B.</dc:creator>
<dc:subject xml:lang="en-US">guided discovery, integrated science learning, problem based learning, scientific literacy</dc:subject>
<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to describe the comparison of students’ scientific literacy improvement in integrated science learning through guided dicovery and problem based learning models. The subjects were 8th grade students of State Junior High Schools in Bandung. This research design was quasi-experimental with non randomaized static group pretest-posttest design. The instrument used in this study was multiple choice test and attitude scale. The result shows that the improvement of scientific literacy achievement of students who learned integrated science through guided discovery and problem based learning models did not differ significantly. Integrated science learning through guided disovery models can improve student literacy achievement with the gain of 0.37 (medium category), while by using problem based learning model can improve scientific literacy with the gain of 0.41 (medium category). It can be concluded that the both models of guided discovery and problem based learning can improve students' science literacy. </dc:description>
<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (FMIPA)</dc:publisher>
<dc:contributor xml:lang="en-US"></dc:contributor>
<dc:date>2016-04-18</dc:date>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/5786</dc:identifier>
<dc:identifier>10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786</dc:identifier>
<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia; Vol 5, No 1 (2016): April 2016; 31-37</dc:source>
<dc:source>2089-4392</dc:source>
<dc:source>2339-1286</dc:source>
<dc:source>10.15294/jpii.v5i1</dc:source>
<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/jpii/article/view/5786/4702</dc:relation>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education)</dc:rights>
<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>
Citations and indexing
OpenAlex
Indexed
via DOI
94 citations
Crossref
Not found
Counts as reported by each index on 29 Okt 2026; indexes count citations differently.
OpenAlex also lists this work in: doaj.
Cite this article
APA 7
Ardianto, D., & Rubini, B. (2016). COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING THROUGH MODEL OF GUIDED DISCOVERY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5(1), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786
Copy
IEEE
D. Ardianto and B. Rubini, “COMPARISON OF STUDENTS’ SCIENTIFIC LITERACY IN INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING THROUGH MODEL OF GUIDED DISCOVERY AND PROBLEM BASED LEARNING,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2016, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v5i1.5786.
Copy
Generated from the journal's metadata; check author names before use.