Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

THE COMPATIBILITY OF READING EXERCISES WITH BLOOM REVISED TAXONOMY AND 2013 CURRICULUM (A Case of English Textbook Entitled Bahasa Inggris for Grade XI Published by Department of National Education 2014)

English Education Journal · Vol. 6 No. 2 (2017) · hlm. 42–51

ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2017-02-26
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study is aimed at identifying the cognitive processes and knowledge dimension of the Revised Bloom Taxonomy involved in the reading exercises; determining how the Lower Order Thinking Skills and Higher Order Thinking Skills are realized through the reading exercises; and determining how the reading exercisesin the textbook are compatible with 2013 curriculum. The English textbook being analysed is “BAHASA INGGRIS” for grade XI published by the Department of National Education 2014. The results concluded that (1) there are only three cognitive processes found: Remember, Understand and Evaluate, indicate that the reading exercises are not in hierarchical order. (2) There are two knowledge dimensions found: factual knowledge and metacognitive knowledgeimplythat the knowledge dimension offered is not varied. (3) The reading materials promote more Lower Order Thinking Skills than Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) The reading exercises in the textbook is less compatible with 2013 curriculum. Each chapter presents only one reading text and it lacks of information on the generic structure and the linguistics features of the related text. A textbook should not only be compatible with the current curriculum, but also have a characteristic of cognitive development and critical thinking.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 104 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • State University of Semarang
  • Institut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember4
Warsono WarsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Soegiyanto SoegiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Setya RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tri NurharsonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ricko IrawanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Arif PurnomoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ferani MulianingsihAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anang Widhi NirwansyahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suharyati SuharyatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aan Probo WirantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Indah HandayaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afief FakhruddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pamujo Effa KusdianangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaila TuananyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Manikowati ManikowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Riyadh Ahsanul ArifinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kiki Nuriska DenhasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulianti YuliantiInstitut Ilmu Sosial dan Manajemen STIAMI1
Nur Laila HafidhohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nuna Mustikawati DewiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anjar SetiawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Semarang1
Suroyo SuroyoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rifki Nurlaili HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roni WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hesti Eka WardaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE COMPATIBILITY OF READING EXERCISES WITH BLOOM REVISED TAXONOMY AND 2013 CURRICULUM (A Case of English Textbook Entitled Bahasa Inggris for Grade XI Published by Department of National Education 2014)</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Arvianto, Zuhrian Ivan</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Faridi, Abdurrahman</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linggar Bharati, Dwi Anggani</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study is aimed at identifying the cognitive processes and knowledge dimension of the Revised Bloom Taxonomy involved in the reading exercises; determining how the Lower Order Thinking Skills and Higher Order Thinking Skills are realized through the reading exercises; and determining how the reading exercisesin the textbook are compatible with 2013 curriculum. The English&amp;nbsp; textbook being analysed is “BAHASA INGGRIS” for grade XI published by the Department of National Education 2014. The results concluded that (1) there are only three cognitive processes found: Remember, Understand and Evaluate, indicate that the reading exercises are not in hierarchical order. (2) There are two knowledge dimensions found: factual knowledge and metacognitive knowledgeimplythat the knowledge dimension offered is not varied. (3) The reading materials promote more Lower Order Thinking Skills than Higher Order Thinking Skills. (4) The reading exercises in the textbook is less compatible with 2013 curriculum. Each chapter presents only one reading text and it lacks of information on the generic structure and the linguistics features of the related text. A textbook should not only be compatible with the current curriculum, but also have a characteristic of cognitive development and critical thinking.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-02-26</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/13056</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 6 No 2 (2016); 42-51</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/13056/7144</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>