Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) AND GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) TECHNIQUEsTO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION TO STUDENTS WITH HIGH AND LOW MOTIVATION

English Education Journal · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017) · hlm. 47–53

DOI
10.15294/eej.v7i1.14685
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2017-06-02
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to describe the significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high motivation, to describe the significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with low motivation, to explain which one is more effective between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high and low motivation and to describe whether there is interaction among the teachniques, motivation, and teaching reading comprehension in this study.This study wass a quasi-experimental study. There were 26 students in the experimental and control group. They were divided into students with high and low motivation in each group. Test, questionnaire, and observation were used as the instruments of this study. The findings of this study are: there is significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high motivation, Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) technique is effective to teach reading comprehension to students with high and low motivation than Group Investigation (GI) technique, and there is no interaction among the techniques, motivation, and teaching reading comprehension. In conclusion, teaching reading comprehension of narrative text with Student Team Achievement Divivsion (STAD) technique is effective for students with high and low motivation. Thus, it is recommended that STAD technique be implemented in teaching reading comprehension.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 69 tautan kepenulisan bersama · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoAfiliasi tidak diketahui4
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Prahita Isnaini NingtyasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hendrikus Joko YuliantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zulfa SakhiyyaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Anindya PangestikaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaely HidayatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lucky Kristina DamayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Andika Farid AbdillahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Amalia RahmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Rofi’iAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ismi KusumaningroemAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad SofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Masfa MaizaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Daud JiwandonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahmad TauchidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dafi KhusnitaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agnes Arum BudianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ana SugiatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hasan Abdul KoharAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Lulu' EkadiniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus Adib LutfiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tia PertamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Helena I.R AgustienAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nawang WulanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eko PurwantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Tandiyo RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Setya RahayuAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sumaryanti SumaryantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Hari AmirullahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ahlis Qoidah NoorAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENT TEAM ACHIEVEMENT DIVISION (STAD) AND GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) TECHNIQUEsTO TEACH READING COMPREHENSION TO STUDENTS WITH HIGH AND LOW MOTIVATION</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Chotimah, Nor</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Rukmini, Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to describe the significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high motivation, to describe the significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with low motivation, to explain which one is more effective between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high and low motivation and to describe whether there is interaction among the teachniques, motivation, and teaching reading comprehension in this study.This study wass a quasi-experimental study. There were 26 students in the experimental and control group. They were divided into students with high and low motivation in each group. Test, questionnaire, and observation were used as the instruments of this study. The findings of this study are: there is significant difference between STAD and GI techniques to teach reading comprehension to students with high motivation, Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) technique is effective to teach&amp;nbsp; reading comprehension to students with high and low motivation than Group Investigation (GI) technique, and there is no interaction among the techniques, motivation, and teaching reading comprehension. In conclusion, teaching reading comprehension of narrative text with Student Team Achievement Divivsion (STAD) technique is effective for students with high and low motivation. Thus, it is recommended that STAD technique be implemented in teaching reading comprehension.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-06-02</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v7i1.14685</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 7 No 1 (2017); 47-53</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/14685/8006</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>