Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Effect of Discovery Learning and Direct Instruction on EFL Learners with Different Learning Styles

English Education Journal · Vol. 10 No. 3 (2020) · hlm. 347–403

DOI
10.15294/eej.v10i1.37131
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Terbit
2020-09-15
Penerbit
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study is experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effect of discovery learning and direct instruction on EFL learners with different learning style (The Tenth Graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang). The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang in the 2018/2019 academic year. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Direct Instruction method was used in the experimental class I, while Discovery Learning method was used in experimental class II. To know-how is the effect of direct instruction to visual and auditory and how is the effect of discovery learning to visual and auditory, T-test was used. To know-how is the difference in the achievement between visual and auditory by using direct instruction and discovery learning, students’ mean scores in experimental classes I and II were compared. While two-way ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to know how significant relationships among the methods and the learning style. The result of this study showed that direct instruction and discovery learning methods are effective to be used in teaching writing for visual and auditory learning style students. There were no significant differences in achievement between visual and auditory learning style students using direct instruction and discovery learning methods. For the interaction among the variables, it shows that there was no interaction among the methods, students’ learning style, and students’ writing skill.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 114 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 3 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • University Elmergib
  • Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Djoko SutopoState University of Semarang8
Dwi RukminiState University of Semarang7
Sri Wuli FitriatiState University of Semarang6
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiState University of Semarang5
Mursid SalehState University of Semarang5
Suwandi SuwandiState University of Semarang5
Abdurrachman FaridiState University of Semarang5
Warsono WarsonoState University of Semarang4
Henrikus Joko YuliantoState University of Semarang3
Zulfa SakhiyyaState University of Semarang3
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang2
Issy YuliasriState University of Semarang2
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoState University of Semarang2
Abdurrachman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Rudi HartonoState University of Semarang2
Rosnawintang RosnawintangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nur AzisahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yuliana YulianaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rini MaulidhawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Januarius MujiantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eka FatmawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdelbaset Mohamed WajejUniversity Elmergib1
Nanda LahitaState University of Semarang1
Muh Imam ShofwanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ivvon Septina BellaState University of Semarang1
abdulhakim faraj alowalidAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Musmuliadi MusmuliadiState University of Semarang1
Ratih OktavianiState University of Semarang1
Sisilia Agustin Dini IslamiState University of Semarang1
Dwi Amalia PutriState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Aulia TaufiqiState University of Semarang1
Muhammad Alimul KhakimState University of Semarang1
Hindria Ariyanti RodiahState University of Semarang1
Maria Fridolin NabenState University of Semarang1
Lisa Binti HarunState University of Semarang1
Tarina DashelaUniversitas Bina Sarana Informatika1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Effect of Discovery Learning and Direct Instruction on EFL Learners with Different Learning Styles</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Munfa'ati, Heny</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Suwandi, Suwandi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study is experimental research with a factorial design which aimed to find out the effect of discovery learning and direct instruction on EFL learners with different learning style (The Tenth Graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang). The samples of the study were tenth graders of SMA Negeri 15 Semarang in the 2018/2019 academic year. There were two classes, experimental class I and experimental class II which every class consisted of 20 students. Direct Instruction method was used in the experimental class I, while Discovery Learning method was used in experimental class II. To know-how is the effect of direct instruction to visual and auditory and how is the effect of discovery learning to visual and auditory, T-test was used. To know-how is the difference in the achievement between visual and auditory by using direct instruction and discovery learning, students’ mean scores in experimental classes I and II were compared. While two-way ANOVA with F-test at the 5% (0.05) level of significance was used to know how significant relationships among the methods and the learning style. The result of this study showed that direct instruction and discovery learning methods are effective to be used in teaching writing for visual and auditory learning style students. There were no significant differences in achievement between visual and auditory learning style students using direct instruction and discovery learning methods. For the interaction among the variables, it shows that there was no interaction among the methods, students’ learning style, and students’ writing skill.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/37131</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v10i1.37131</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 10 No 3 (2020): September 2020; 347-403</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v10i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/37131/15395</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2020 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>