Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE TRANSLATE’S QUALITY IN EMPLOYING TRANSLATION TECHNIQUES

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 7 No. 1 (2018) · hlm. 40–49

DOI
10.15294/elt.v7i1.25304
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Terbit
2018-08-30
Penerbit
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This research focused on the analysis of translation techniques and translation quality of Jakarta Post’s articles in terms of accuracy, acceptability, and readability. The objectives of this research were to find out the translation techniques applied by Google Translate in translating the articles of Jakarta Post and to know the quality of translation by Google Translate. This research applied a descriptive qualitative method. The data were obtained by using content analysis and questionnaire. The data in this research were ten articles of Jakarta Post from opinion section. The other data were the results of the translation quality assessments done by the respondents. The research findings showed that Google Translate applied 9 translation techniques. They were reduction, established equivalent, literal, calque, amplification, transposition, linguistic amplification, linguistic compression, and borrowing technique. The results of the questionnaires showed that the percentage of accuracy was 57.1% with average score 2.5, the percentage of acceptability was 58.6% with the average score 2.5, and the percentage of readability was 63.7% with the average score 2.5. Based on the results obtained, the quality of translation results by Google Translate was less accurate, less acceptable, and less readable. According to the analysis, it can be concluded that calque technique had the best translation quality considering this technique got the highest score in every aspect. While reduction technique was the least because this technique got the lowest score in every aspect. The researcher suggested the users to translate simple sentence instead of a complex one to gain a better quality of translation using Google Translate.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

17 penulis · 23 tautan kepenulisan bersama

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Jimmi JimmiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ari Iswanto WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prapti Wigati PurwaningrumAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Baruna PriasmoroAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Alfian KhabibiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Danar SuryawijayaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Putri AprilianiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dwi Putri SetyaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Intan Permata HapsariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Novita SetiawatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
SRI WAHYUNIAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rizka D. A. A.Afiliasi tidak diketahui1
Prahda Alifa FegasantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pandu Perdana PutraAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 5 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">ANALYSIS OF GOOGLE TRANSLATE’S QUALITY IN EMPLOYING TRANSLATION TECHNIQUES</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kartika, Dewi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Priyatmojo, Arif Suryo</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This research focused on the analysis of translation techniques and translation quality of Jakarta Post’s articles in terms of accuracy, acceptability, and readability. The objectives of this research were to find out the translation techniques applied by Google Translate in translating the articles of Jakarta Post and to know the quality of translation by Google Translate. This research applied a descriptive qualitative method. The data were obtained by using content analysis and questionnaire. The data in this research were ten articles of Jakarta Post from opinion section. The other data were the results of the translation quality assessments done by the respondents. The research findings showed that Google Translate applied 9 translation techniques. They were reduction, established equivalent, literal, calque, amplification, transposition, linguistic amplification, linguistic compression, and borrowing technique. The results of the questionnaires showed that the percentage of accuracy was 57.1% with average score 2.5, the percentage of acceptability was 58.6% with the average score 2.5, and the percentage of readability was 63.7% with the average score 2.5. Based on the results obtained, the quality of translation results by Google Translate was less accurate, less acceptable, and less readable. According to the analysis, it can be concluded that calque technique had the best translation quality considering this technique got the highest score in every aspect. While reduction technique was the least because this technique got the lowest score in every aspect. The researcher suggested the users to translate simple sentence instead of a complex one to gain a better quality of translation using Google Translate.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-08-30</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25304</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v7i1.25304</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 7 No 1 (2018): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 40-49</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v7i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/25304/11348</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>