Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

Teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions toward critical questions in EFL classroom interaction

ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching · Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021) · hlm. 136–145

DOI
10.15294/elt.v10i2.43302
ISSN
2721-4532, 2252-6706
Terbit
2021-07-27
Penerbit
English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

This study aims to find out teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions of critical questions in EFL classroom interaction. This research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the classroom interaction was online. We used a case study design that focused on the descriptive analysis. This study was conducted at one of Senior High Schools in Semarang. The participants in this study are two English teachers and two classes. The data were gained by using classroom observation, interview, questionnaire, and documentation. We used Chen’s (2016) theory and Anderson & Krathwohl (2001) to categorize and analyze the data findings to know teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions toward critical questions in EFL classroom interaction. The result of the analysis showed that the teachers used all of the teachers' questioning strategies and they posed critical questions. Teachers questioning strategies used by the teachers when posing critical questions were wait-time, repetition, paraphrasing, simplifying, and probing. The obvious strategy to elicit students’ responses toward critical questions was probing. In line with this, the teachers also combined the teachers questioning strategies with the skill of basic questioning to elicit students’ critical answers. The students didn’t perceive critical question as a threat, although it was difficult to answer. However, they perceived critical question as a challenge for them. It can be concluded that the students perceived critical question as a motivational question.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 87 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Dwi RukminiAfiliasi tidak diketahui5
Januarius MujiyantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui3
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember2
Puji AstutiAfiliasi tidak diketahui2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang2
Issy YuliasriAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Afief FakhruddinAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Agus PrayogoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Puspa WijayantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pamujo Effa KusdianangAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Zuhrian Ivan ArviantoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Abdurrahman FaridiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Nurlaila TuananyAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Manikowati ManikowatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kiki Nuriska DenhasAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Yulianti YuliantiUniversitas Halu Oleo1
Anjar SetiawanUniversitas Muhammadiyah Semarang1
Rifki Nurlaili HidayatAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Roni WahyudiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Setyani Rohmatul MuthohharohAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Suwandi SuwandiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ali Akbar RafsanjaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Oktianti Dwi AryaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Eva RahmatunnisaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Diana Novietasari BedagamaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dian Fathur RahmanAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Aldin RamdaniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Silvia Nanda Putri EritoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Mursid SalehAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
kifti halimah islamiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Rudi HartonoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Ade Dwi CahyantiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Fitria Uswatun AzizahAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Sri Wuli FitriatiAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Imaduddin Abil FidaAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Dhiayuddin Dzulfikar W TawaryAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Pipit AmbarsariAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Febri Dhany TriwibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt/oai, pertama di-harvest 5 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 8 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions toward critical questions in EFL classroom interaction</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kholisoh, Modi Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linggar Bharati, Dwi Anggani</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to find out teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions of critical questions in EFL classroom interaction. This research was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, in which the classroom interaction was online. We used a case study design that focused on the descriptive analysis. This study was conducted at one of Senior High Schools in Semarang. The participants in this study are two English teachers and two classes. The data were gained by using classroom observation, interview, questionnaire, and documentation. We used Chen’s (2016) theory and Anderson &amp;amp; Krathwohl (2001) to categorize and analyze the data findings to know teachers’ questioning strategies and students’ perceptions toward critical questions in EFL classroom interaction. The result of the analysis showed that the teachers used all of the teachers' questioning strategies and they posed critical questions. Teachers questioning strategies used by the teachers when posing critical questions were wait-time, repetition, paraphrasing, simplifying, and probing. The obvious strategy to elicit students’ responses toward critical questions was probing. In line with this, the teachers also combined the teachers questioning strategies with the skill of basic questioning to elicit students’ critical answers. The students didn’t perceive critical question as a threat, although it was difficult to answer. However, they perceived critical question as a challenge for them. It can be concluded that the students perceived critical question as a motivational question.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">English Department, Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2021-07-27</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/43302</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/elt.v10i2.43302</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; Vol 10 No 2 (2021): ELT Forum: Journal of English Language Teaching; 136-145</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2721-4532</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6706</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/elt.v10i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/elt/article/view/43302/19564</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2021 Modi Nur Kholisoh</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>