Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

KOMPARASI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA SMP TENTANG HUKUM ARCHIMEDES ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK

Unnes Physics Education Journal · Vol. 4 No. 2 (2015)

DOI
10.15294/upej.v4i2.7426
ISSN
2503-2313, 2252-6935
Terbit
2015-09-12
Penerbit
UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Pada materi hukum Archimedes siswa dituntut untuk memahami konsep beserta aplikasinya. Alternatif pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa adalah pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik dan TAI pendekatan saintifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik; (2) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik; (3) menguji perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori, (4) menguji pemahaman konsep siswa yang lebih baik antara siswa pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Brangsong tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Pengambilan sampel penelitian melalui teknik cluster random sampling. Analisis data pemahaman konsep meliputi uji normalitas Chi-Kuadrat, uji proporsi, uji One Way Anova, dan uji lanjut Scheffe. Simpulan yang diperoleh adalah (1) pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 90,32%; (2) sampel pada pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 75%, tetapi untuk populasi belum mencapai ketuntasan; (3) terdapat perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori; (4) pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik yaitu 83,4 lebih baik dibandingkan pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik yaitu 78,2 dan pembelajaran ekspositori yaitu 72,5. In The Law of Archimedes, students comprehension of the concepts along with its application is required. Alternative learning to improve conceptual understanding of students are the PBL and TAI of scientific approach. This research aims to (1)  determine the completeness of PBL scientific approach learning; (2) determine the completeness of TAI scientific approach learning; (3) examining the differences of student understanding concept among the PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning (4) testing whichone were better between students with PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning for students understanding concept. The population in this research was the 8th grade of students from Junior High School 1 Brangsong in 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this program was taking by cluster random sampling technic. The data analyzing of students understanding concept include test for normality using Chi-Square, proportion test, One Way Anova test, and further tests with Scheffe. The conclusions obtained were (1) understanding concept of students with PBL thoroughly scientific approach learning reached 90,32%, (2) Sample for understanding concept of students through TAI scientific approach reached 75%, but the population were not passed the exhaustiveness, (3) average difference of students concept understanding occured in students with PBL scientific approach, TAI scientific approach, and expository learning, (4) average score students understanding concept with PBL scientific approach learning (83,4) was better than the average of students understanding concept with TAI scientific approaches learning (78,2) and expository learning (72,5) Â

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 102 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 4 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • National Research and Innovation Agency
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang3
. HartonoState University of Semarang2
Dwi YuliantiState University of Semarang2
Sulhadi SulhadiState University of Semarang2
Akbari Indra BasukiNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Didi RosiyadiNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Iwan Rizal SetiawanNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Taufik Ibnu SalimNational Research and Innovation Agency1
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang1
Prasetyo ListiajiState University of Semarang1
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang1
Andin Vita AmaliaState University of Semarang1
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang1
Cristian DamayantiState University of Semarang1
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang1
Danang Triasmoro AdhiState University of Semarang1
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang1
Muhammad IrsyadState University of Semarang1
Murbangun NuswowatiState University of Semarang1
Hayu RistinaState University of Semarang1
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang1
Umi Roufatuz ZahroState University of Semarang1
Sutikno SutiknoState University of Semarang1
Ninda Yera Setyo NainggolanState University of Semarang1
Umi Syahadah AlimiahState University of Semarang1
Aditya MarianaState University of Semarang1
Bambang SubaliState University of Semarang1
Falis Ulil HidayahState University of Semarang1
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang1
Candra AbdillahState University of Semarang1
Wahyu HardyantoState University of Semarang1
Yulita NurbaitiState University of Semarang1
Listiyanto ListiyantoState University of Semarang1
Dea Fahmi Safitri FahmiState University of Semarang1
Candrasa Sesareza KisnaState University of Semarang1
Fifin Dewi RatnasariState University of Semarang1
Yekti WidyawatiState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/upej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc) 
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">KOMPARASI PEMAHAMAN KONSEP SISWA SMP TENTANG HUKUM ARCHIMEDES ANTARA PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Najah, Farida Nurun</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Linuwih, Suharto</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Susanto, Hadi</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Pada materi hukum Archimedes siswa dituntut untuk memahami konsep beserta aplikasinya. Alternatif pembelajaran untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep siswa adalah pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik dan TAI pendekatan saintifik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik; (2) mengetahui ketuntasan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik; (3) menguji perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori, (4) menguji pemahaman konsep siswa yang lebih baik antara siswa pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Brangsong tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Pengambilan sampel penelitian melalui teknik cluster random sampling. Analisis data pemahaman konsep meliputi uji normalitas Chi-Kuadrat, uji proporsi, uji One Way Anova, dan uji lanjut Scheffe. Simpulan yang diperoleh adalah (1) pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 90,32%; (2) sampel pada pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik tuntas mencapai 75%, tetapi untuk populasi belum mencapai ketuntasan; (3) terdapat perbedaan rata-rata pemahaman konsep siswa antara pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik, TAI pendekatan saintifik, dan ekspositori; (4) pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran PBL pendekatan saintifik yaitu 83,4 lebih baik dibandingkan pemahaman konsep siswa dengan pembelajaran TAI pendekatan saintifik yaitu 78,2 dan pembelajaran ekspositori yaitu 72,5. In The Law of Archimedes, students comprehension of  the concepts along with its application is required. Alternative learning to improve conceptual understanding of students are the PBL and TAI of scientific approach. This research aims to (1)  determine the completeness of PBL scientific approach learning; (2) determine the completeness of TAI scientific approach learning; (3) examining the differences of student understanding concept among the PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning (4) testing whichone were better between students with PBL scientific approach learning, TAI scientific approach learning, and expository learning for students understanding concept. The population in this research was the 8th grade of students from Junior High School 1 Brangsong in 2014/2015 academic year. The sample of this program was taking by cluster random sampling technic. The data analyzing of students understanding concept include test for normality using Chi-Square, proportion test, One Way Anova test, and further tests with Scheffe. The conclusions obtained were (1) understanding concept of students with PBL thoroughly scientific approach learning reached 90,32%, (2) Sample for understanding concept of students through TAI scientific approach reached 75%, but the population were not passed the exhaustiveness, (3) average difference of students concept understanding occured in students with PBL scientific approach, TAI scientific approach, and expository learning, (4) average score students understanding concept with PBL scientific approach learning (83,4) was better than the average of students understanding concept with TAI scientific approaches learning (78,2) and expository learning (72,5)  </dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2015-09-12</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/7426</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/upej.v4i2.7426</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">UPEJ Unnes Physics Education Journal; Vol 4 No 2 (2015)</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-2313</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6935</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/upej/article/view/7426/5141</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>