Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Jurnal

The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material

Unnes Science Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 1 (2020) · hlm. 30–39

DOI
10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472
ISSN
2252-6617
Terbit
2020-02-29
Penerbit
Department of Integrated Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in Collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Bahasa
eng

Abstrak

Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.

Jaringan kolaborasi para penulis

40 penulis · 168 tautan kepenulisan bersama · 1 lintas organisasi · menampilkan 40 yang paling banyak terhubung

Arahkan kursor atau ketuk sebuah nama untuk menyorot rekan penulisnya. Klik dua kali untuk membuka halaman penulis.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Sultan Idris Education University
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Organisasi berbeda
  • Organisasi sama
  • Afiliasi tidak diketahui
  • Garis lebih tebal = lebih banyak artikel bersama · lingkaran lebih besar = lebih banyak artikel
Tampilkan sebagai tabel
Rekan penulisOrganisasiArtikel bersama
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang6
Prasetyo ListiajiState University of Semarang4
Stephani Diah PamelasariState University of Semarang4
Erna Noor SavitriState University of Semarang4
Sudarmin SudarminState University of Semarang4
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang3
Muhamad TaufiqState University of Semarang3
Isa AkhlisState University of Semarang3
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang3
Septiko AjiState University of Semarang2
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Irfan Ihza WardanaState University of Semarang2
Andin Vita AmaliaState University of Semarang2
Parmin ParminState University of Semarang2
Arka YanitamaState University of Semarang2
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang1
Sri haryaniState University of Semarang1
Shangeetavaani KannapiranSultan Idris Education University1
S W A WibowoAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
Kasmui KasmuiState University of Semarang1
Mahfud SyahroniAfiliasi tidak diketahui1
D. W. MaharaniState University of Semarang1
V. A. C. SaputriState University of Semarang1
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang1
A. KurniawatiState University of Semarang1
Melissa Salma DarmawanState University of Semarang1
Luthfiyatul LissaadahState University of Semarang1
Aji SaputraState University of Semarang1
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang1
Andhina Putri HeriyantiState University of Semarang1
Fidia FibrianaState University of Semarang1
Dewi MustikaningtyasState University of Semarang1
Putri Alifa KholilState University of Semarang1
Cintiya Egi PurwadiState University of Semarang1
Maulana Malik WicaksonoState University of Semarang1
Andin Vita AmaliaState University of Semarang1
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang1
Suharto LinuwihState University of Semarang1

Afiliasi berasal dari OpenAlex; metadata OAI-PMH jurnal tidak memuatnya. Penulis tanpa ID OpenAlex dicocokkan berdasarkan nama, sehingga dua orang bisa tergabung atau satu orang bisa terpisah.

Sumber metadata: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/usej/oai, pertama di-harvest 6 Nov 2026, terakhir terlihat 6 Nov 2026.
Metadata asli (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Development of Two-tier Multiple Choice Assessment Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) of The Students on Excretion System Material</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Yunita, Yunita</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Dewi, Novi Ratna</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Science learning based on 2013 curriculum requires the students to be able at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve higher order thinking skills (HOTS). The results of observation at SMP N 2 Sukolilo showed that there was no task or question which was specifically used to measure HOTS of the students. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument and HOTS ability of the students. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&amp;amp;D) method. Samples were taken by random sampling technique from the population of class IX students of SMP N 2 Sukolilo in the academic year 2019/2020, then class IX C was selected for small-scale trial, class IX B was selected for large-scale trial, and class IX A was selected for trial use. Data was taken by some methods such as test, questionnaire, and documentation. The characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument was analyzed by expert judgment and empirical testing. Whereas, HOTS level of the students was analyzed using the HOTS Category Scale. The results of the analysis of the characteristics of two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument indicated that the developed instrument had fulfilled the requirement as a good instrument, namely (1) valid, with the result of expert validation as many as 79% (feasible) and the results of the item analysis was 0.49 (sufficient ); (2) reliable, with the reliability result was 0.40 (reliable); (3) relevant, representative, practical, and specific as indicated by the results of the teacher's questionnaire responses with the percentage 75% (good); (4) discriminatory power, with the average of analysis result was 0.36 (good); and (5) proportional / difficulty level, with the analysis result of most questions in the moderate category. Furthermore, the analysis results of HOTS level of the students showed that the students on the large-scale trial were mostly in the moderate category (67%) and some of them in a small portion were in the low category (33%). While, HOTS level of the students on the trial use showed that most of the students were in the moderate category (50%), some of them were in the low category (30%), and a small portion of them were in the high category (20%). The conclusion of this study is the developed two-tier multiple choice assessment instrument has been feasible, because it has met the requirements as a good instrument and can be used to measure HOTS of the students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Department of Integrated Science, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Semarang in Collaboration with Perkumpulan Pendidikan IPA Indonesia</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2020-02-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/usej/article/view/36472</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/usej.v9i1.36472</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Unnes Science Education Journal; Vol 9 No 1 (2020): February 2020; 30-39</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6617</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/usej.v9i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/usej/article/view/36472/16940</dc:relation>
</oai_dc:dc>