Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learners’ Argumentative Essay Texts

English Education Journal · Vol. 9 No. 4 (2019) · pp. 450–458

DOI
10.15294/eej.v9i4.31677
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2019-07-29
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Transitivity systems define as a system to explore how language concernes in the overall grammatical resources for construing going on. The ability to realize transitivity systems in argumentative essays is important because by realizing these systems, the writer can explore language in process of doing, sensing, saying activities happened in the real world. Therefore, this study aims to explore the realization of transitivity systems in students’ argumentative essay texts. There are five argumentative essays written by students who have a good quality in writing skill. The findings show that the writers have already realized six process types corresponding with participants and circumstances. By realizing all process types in essay, the readers can experience different world so that they will know the writers’ experience in using language to mark experiential meaning in essays. In this case, the writers mostly asked readers to experience with process of doing by material process. Thus, the writers moved the readers’ attention by showing the experience of stating relation of the participants. The relation was showed in a configuration of being in attributing and identifying the participants. Therefore, the occurrence of other processes as well as participants and circumstances makes the argumentative essay text more alive. Keywords: Transitivity Systems, Process types, Participants, Circumstances, argumentative essays.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 142 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown14
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown12
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown8
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown5
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown3
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown3
Irawaty IrawatyUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Rini FidiyaniAffiliation unknown2
Eko MukmintoAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
bintang priyanto putriAffiliation unknown2
Holy Latifah HanumAffiliation unknown1
Rahayu Fery AnitasariAffiliation unknown1
Edward Michael SimangunsongAffiliation unknown1
Hafidz DaffaAffiliation unknown1
Samuel Adi NugrohoAffiliation unknown1
Hermin Anggrianing TyasAffiliation unknown1
Moh. Ilhami HakimAffiliation unknown1
Dwi AngganiAffiliation unknown1
M. Syaeful Rizki UAffiliation unknown1
Amalia RahmawatiAffiliation unknown1
Daniela Elivas HastunarAffiliation unknown1
Ahmad SofwanAffiliation unknown1
Bambang Ruby SugiartoAffiliation unknown1
Hendro KuncoroAffiliation unknown1
Muhammad Ari SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Agnes Arum BudianaAffiliation unknown1
Ernidawati ErnidawatiAffiliation unknown1
Miftakhul UlumAffiliation unknown1
Nanda LahitaAffiliation unknown1
Hanhan LovihandrieAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">The Realization of Transitivity Systems in Undergraduate Learners’ Argumentative Essay Texts</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nurkholidah, Endang Siti</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sutopo, Djoko</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Widhiyanto, Widhiyanto</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Transitivity systems define as a system to explore how language concernes in the overall grammatical resources for construing going on. The ability to realize transitivity systems in argumentative essays is important because by realizing these systems, the writer can explore language in process of doing, sensing, saying activities happened in the real world. Therefore, this study aims to explore the realization of transitivity systems in students’ argumentative essay texts. There are five argumentative essays written by students who have a good quality in writing skill. The findings show that the writers have already realized six process types corresponding with participants and circumstances. By realizing all process types in essay, the readers can experience different world so that they will know the writers’ experience in using language to mark experiential meaning in essays. In this case, the writers mostly asked readers to experience with process of doing by material process. Thus, the writers moved the readers’ attention by showing the experience of stating relation of the participants. The relation was showed in a configuration of being in attributing and identifying the participants. Therefore, the occurrence of other processes as well as participants and circumstances makes the argumentative essay text more alive.
Keywords: Transitivity Systems, Process types, Participants, Circumstances, argumentative essays.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2019-07-29</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31677</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v9i4.31677</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 9 No 4 (2019): December 2019; 450-458</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v9i4</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/31677/13777</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2019 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>