Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Evaluation of Students' Mastery of Semantic Entailment as Reflected in Their Descriptive Text Writing

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 246–268

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.71836
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Some challenges in teaching writing are making students interpret, analyze, and build reasoning for a coherent text. To address this issue, such research is included in a branch of linguistics, namely semantics. This research evaluates the students’ mastery of semantic entailment as reflected in their descriptive text writing. The research method applied was a descriptive qualitative design. The data was taken from the 30 explanatory texts written by the eighth-graders of MTs Ar Ridlo Pekuncen 2022/2023. The technique of collecting data was document text. The method of data analysis was triangulation. The results revealed that the evaluation of students’ mastery of one-way entailment is 90%; there were 27 of 30 students. Almost all of the students (generally) are very masterful. Next, the evaluation of students’ mastery of two-way entailment is 36.67% (N=11). Furthermore, only 30.00% of the students (N=9) can master negative entailment. The least (a fraction) mastered was metaphorical entailment, 13.33% (N=4). The easiest for students to master was the one-way entailment. In contrast, the metaphorical entailment was the most difficult. Thus, it can be safely said that the students have difficulty imagining the object in their sentences. For that reason, future research may investigate the factors that cause problems in metaphorical entailment among students.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 186 co-authorship links · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown12
Djoko SutopoAffiliation unknown10
Suwandi SuwandiAffiliation unknown9
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown9
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown7
Warsono WarsonoAffiliation unknown6
Mursid SalehAffiliation unknown5
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown5
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown5
SRI WAHYUNIAffiliation unknown4
Widhiyanto WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown3
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown3
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown3
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown2
Putri AnggraeniAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Dwi Anggani Linggar BharatiAffiliation unknown2
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown2
WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Abdurrahman FaridiAffiliation unknown2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Agung Ginanjar AnjaniputraAffiliation unknown1
Aprilian Ria AdistiAffiliation unknown1
YuliatiAffiliation unknown1
lidiana astutiAffiliation unknown1
Dwi Herwindha MahananiAffiliation unknown1
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown1
Angga Pratama Armadi PutraAffiliation unknown1
Maria Kartika Primaquinna SejatiAffiliation unknown1
Awanda Bramantika SaqifantyAffiliation unknown1
Alief Noor FaridaAffiliation unknown1
Pasca KalisaAffiliation unknown1
Girindra Putri Dewi SaraswatiAffiliation unknown1
Fahrur RoziInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember1
Ali MasyharAffiliation unknown1
Heru SaputraAffiliation unknown1
Dolendra PaudelAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Evaluation of Students' Mastery of Semantic Entailment as Reflected in Their Descriptive Text Writing</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Setyawati, Rika</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Mujiyanto, Januarius</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sakhiyya, Zulfa</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Some challenges in teaching writing are making students interpret, analyze, and build reasoning for a coherent text. To address this issue, such research is included in a branch of linguistics, namely semantics. This research evaluates the students’ mastery of semantic entailment as reflected in their descriptive text writing. The research method applied was a descriptive qualitative design. The data was taken from the 30 explanatory texts written by the eighth-graders of MTs Ar Ridlo Pekuncen 2022/2023. The technique of collecting data was document text. The method of data analysis was triangulation. The results revealed that the evaluation of students’ mastery of one-way entailment is 90%; there were 27 of 30 students. Almost all of the students (generally) are very masterful. Next, the evaluation of students’ mastery of two-way entailment is 36.67% (N=11). Furthermore, only 30.00% of the students (N=9) can master negative entailment. The least (a fraction) mastered was metaphorical entailment, 13.33% (N=4). The easiest for students to master was the one-way entailment. In contrast, the metaphorical entailment was the most difficult. Thus, it can be safely said that the students have difficulty imagining the object in their sentences. For that reason, future research may investigate the factors that cause problems in metaphorical entailment among students.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71836</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.71836</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 246-268</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/71836/25542</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>