Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Unraveling EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK through Self-Report Data

English Education Journal · Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023) · pp. 246–257

DOI
10.15294/eej.v13i2.72586
ISSN
2087-0108, 2502-4566
Published
2023-06-20
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The technological revolution has changed the required knowledge and skills of teachers in facilitating the development of students’ 21st-century skills. In light of this, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) has been defined as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base needed for effective technology integration into classroom practices. However, generally, teacher professional education programs do not help teacher candidates develop TPACK. From this standpoint, the purpose of the study was to better understand the nature of pre-service English teachers’ TPACK over the professional development program named Pre-Service Teacher Professional Education (TPE) or Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Prajabatan. A survey was applied to examine 30 EFL pre-service teachers’ TPACK using self-report as the data source. The self-report was adopted from Schmid et al. (2020), and it consists of 28 items of the seven TPACK components. The results demonstrated that EFL pre-service teachers see the value of technology for teaching English. They highly perceived their TPACK competencies, especially for the TK construct (M=4.05) and the TPACK construct (M=4.08). They need more guidance on how to effectively integrate technology though. Thus, teacher professional education programs should redesign various methods of courses to provide more opportunities for pre-service English teachers to teach with technology since experiences had the most effect on beliefs.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 140 co-authorship links · 1 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • Universitas Halu Oleo
  • State University of Semarang
  • Gunadarma University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Muhammad Syukri SadimantaraUniversitas Halu Oleo11
SRI REJEKIUniversitas Halu Oleo10
RH Fitri FaradillaAffiliation unknown10
Ansharullah AnsharullahUniversitas Halu Oleo8
Andi KhaeruniUniversitas Halu Oleo7
Hermanto HermantoUniversitas Halu Oleo6
Asnani AsnaniAffiliation unknown5
LA KARIMUNAUniversitas Halu Oleo4
Sigit PriatmokoState University of Semarang4
Rudi HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Januarius MujiyantoAffiliation unknown4
Abdurrachman FaridiAffiliation unknown4
Tamrin TamrinUniversitas Halu Oleo3
Subiyanto Hadi SaputroAffiliation unknown3
Puji AstutiAffiliation unknown3
Dwi RukminiAffiliation unknown3
Nur AsyikUniversitas Halu Oleo2
Sarinah SarinahAffiliation unknown2
Rahayu Puji HaryantiAffiliation unknown2
Sri KadarwatiState University of Semarang2
F. ‪Widhi MahatmantiAffiliation unknown2
Harjito HarjitoAffiliation unknown2
Agung Tri PrasetyaState University of Semarang2
Jumaeri JumaeriAffiliation unknown2
WidhiyantoAffiliation unknown2
Henrikus Joko YuliantoAffiliation unknown2
Issy YuliasriAffiliation unknown2
Sri Wuli FitriatiAffiliation unknown2
Hendi PratamaAffiliation unknown2
Nurul HidayatiAffiliation unknown1
Rudi TriyonoAffiliation unknown1
Rindi Anti Nur FadhilahAffiliation unknown1
LIANTO -Affiliation unknown1
Fitrianingsih FitrianingsihGunadarma University1
Safrika SafrikaAffiliation unknown1
Bagio BagioAffiliation unknown1
Rezqi MaliaAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/eej/oai, first harvested 5 Nov 2026, last seen 5 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Unraveling EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ TPACK through Self-Report Data</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Susanti, Yuni Dwi</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Wahyuni, Sri</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Sakhiyya, Zulfa</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The technological revolution has changed the required knowledge and skills of teachers in facilitating the development of students’ 21st-century skills. In light of this, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) has been defined as a useful conceptual framework to help define the knowledge base needed for effective technology integration into classroom practices. However, generally, teacher professional education programs do not help teacher candidates develop TPACK. From this standpoint, the purpose of the study was to better understand the nature of pre-service English teachers’ TPACK over the professional development program named Pre-Service Teacher Professional Education (TPE) or Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) Prajabatan. A survey was applied to examine 30 EFL pre-service teachers’ TPACK using self-report as the data source. The self-report was adopted from Schmid et al. (2020), and it consists of 28 items of the seven TPACK components. The results demonstrated that EFL pre-service teachers see the value of technology for teaching English. They highly perceived their TPACK competencies, especially for the TK construct (M=4.05) and the TPACK construct (M=4.08). They need more guidance on how to effectively integrate technology though. Thus, teacher professional education programs should redesign various methods of courses to provide more opportunities for pre-service English teachers to teach with technology since experiences had the most effect on beliefs.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2023-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72586</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/eej.v13i2.72586</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">English Education Journal; Vol 13 No 2 (2023): June 2023; 246-257</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2087-0108</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4566</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/eej.v13i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/eej/article/view/72586/25461</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 English Education Journal</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>