Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Instrumen Penilaian Diri Kompetensi Klinis Mahasiswa Kedokteran

Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation · Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017) · pp. 81–89

DOI
10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16212
ISSN
2503-1732, 2252-6420
Published
2017-08-08
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

Penilaian diri dibutuhkan untuk refleksi diri kompetensi klinis bagi mahasiswa sebagai dasar pengembangan diri. Penilaian diri yang selama ini dilakukan belum mampu secara akurat memberikan gambaran kompetensi klinis mahasiswa. Penelitian bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen yang valid, reliabel, dan efektif untuk melakukan penilaian diri kompetensi klinis. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran dengan rancangan sekuensial eksploratoris. Penelitian dilakukan dalam 4 tahap. Tahap identifikasi dimensi kompetensi klinis dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka. Tahap penyusunan instrumen dilakukan dengan menyusun definisi konseptual, dimensi, dan indikator, penyusunan kisi-kisi instrumen, menulis butir-butir instrumen, dan penentuan skala pengukuran. Tahap validasi instrumen dilakukan dengan meminta pertimbangan ahli dalam bidang pendidikan kedokteran dan dianalisis menggunakan Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Tahap implementasi, instrumen diuji reliabilitasnya. Reliabilitas instrumen dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach’s. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dimensi kompetensi klinis terdiri dari hubungan dokter-pasien, anamnesis, pemeriksaan fisik, kemampuan diagnostik, tata laksana, ketrampilan komunikasi, dan profesionalitas. CVR diperoleh nilai positif pada semua butir sehingga instrumen dinyatakan valid. Uji reliabilitas instrumen menunjukkan nilai Alpha 0.949 sehingga instrumen dinyatakan reliabel. Butir-butir di dalam instrumen telah mencerminkan keseluruhan komponen kompetensi dan memiliki konsistensi dalam mengukur konstruk yang sama, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan mahasiswa untuk mengukur kompetensi klinisnya masing-masing sebagai bahan pengembangan diri. Self-assessment is needed for self-reflection of clinical competence for students as a basis for self-development. Unfortunately, self-assessment has not been able to accurately provide an overview of student clinical competence. The aims of the study is to develop a valid, reliable, and effective self-assessment instrument of clinical competence.The study used a mixed method. The study was conducted in 4 stages. The identification of clinical competence’s dimensions in medical students was done through in-depth interview and literature study. The instrument compilation was performed by defining conceptual definitions, dimensions, and indicators, arranging the instrument blueprint, writing instrument items, and determining the measurement scale. The validation was performed by expert in medical education, and analyzed using Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Instrument implemented and tested quantitatively its reliability. Reliability was analyzed with Alpha Cronbach's. The dimensions of clinical competence consisted of: physician-patient relationships, anamnesis, physical examination, diagnostic ability, management, communication skills, and professionalism. CVR obtained positive values ​​on each item so the instrument is valid. Test reliability of the instrument shows Alpha 0.949 so the instrument is reliable. Self-Assessment Instrument of Clinical Competence for Medical The items within the instrument have reflected the overall component of competence and have consistency in measuring the same constructs, so that students can use it to measure their own clinical competence as a self-development material.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 140 co-authorship links · 3 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Amin RetnoningsihAffiliation unknown5
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Sri NgabektiState University of Semarang3
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAffiliation unknown3
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang3
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang3
Siti Harnina BintariAffiliation unknown3
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang3
Ely RudyatmiAffiliation unknown3
Ning SetiatiAffiliation unknown3
Dian Puspita DewiAffiliation unknown3
Diana Nur AfifahAffiliation unknown3
Fatikhu Yatuni AsmaraAffiliation unknown3
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang2
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga2
Endang SusiloningsihAffiliation unknown2
Yusuf Zakarias ManutedeAffiliation unknown2
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang2
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi PurwantiAffiliation unknown2
Mohammad AkhlasAffiliation unknown2
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang2
Sri Mulyani Endang SusilowatiAffiliation unknown2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAffiliation unknown2
Dwita TrianaAffiliation unknown2
Hartono HartonoAffiliation unknown2
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang2
Dyah Rini IndriyantiAffiliation unknown2
Suharto LinuwihmoAffiliation unknown2
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown2
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown2
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown2
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang2
Anindita Firdatul JannahAffiliation unknown2
Sony ZulfikasariState University of Semarang1
Ratna Dewi PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Instrumen Penilaian Diri Kompetensi Klinis Mahasiswa Kedokteran</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Novitasari, Andra</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ridlo, Saiful</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Kristina, Tri Nur</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">Penilaian diri dibutuhkan untuk refleksi diri kompetensi klinis bagi mahasiswa sebagai dasar pengembangan diri. Penilaian diri yang selama ini dilakukan belum mampu secara akurat memberikan gambaran kompetensi klinis mahasiswa. Penelitian bertujuan mengembangkan instrumen yang valid, reliabel, dan efektif untuk melakukan penilaian diri kompetensi klinis. Penelitian menggunakan metode campuran dengan rancangan sekuensial eksploratoris. Penelitian dilakukan dalam 4 tahap. Tahap identifikasi dimensi kompetensi klinis dilakukan melalui wawancara mendalam dan studi pustaka. Tahap penyusunan instrumen dilakukan dengan menyusun definisi konseptual, dimensi, dan indikator, penyusunan kisi-kisi instrumen, menulis butir-butir instrumen, dan penentuan skala pengukuran. Tahap validasi instrumen dilakukan dengan meminta pertimbangan ahli dalam bidang pendidikan kedokteran dan dianalisis menggunakan Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Tahap implementasi, instrumen diuji reliabilitasnya. Reliabilitas instrumen dianalisis menggunakan Alpha Cronbach’s. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dimensi kompetensi klinis terdiri dari hubungan dokter-pasien, anamnesis, pemeriksaan fisik, kemampuan diagnostik, tata laksana, ketrampilan komunikasi, dan profesionalitas. CVR diperoleh nilai positif pada semua butir sehingga instrumen dinyatakan valid. Uji reliabilitas instrumen menunjukkan nilai Alpha 0.949 sehingga instrumen dinyatakan reliabel. Butir-butir di dalam instrumen telah mencerminkan keseluruhan komponen kompetensi dan memiliki konsistensi dalam mengukur konstruk yang sama, sehingga dapat dimanfaatkan mahasiswa untuk mengukur kompetensi klinisnya masing-masing sebagai bahan pengembangan diri.
Self-assessment is needed for self-reflection of clinical competence for students as a basis for self-development. Unfortunately, self-assessment has not been able to accurately provide an overview of student clinical competence. The aims of the study is to develop a valid, reliable, and effective self-assessment instrument of clinical competence.The study used a mixed method. The study was conducted in 4 stages. The identification of clinical competence’s dimensions in medical students was done through in-depth interview and literature study. The instrument compilation&amp;nbsp; was performed by defining conceptual definitions, dimensions, and indicators, arranging the instrument blueprint, writing instrument items, and determining the measurement scale. The validation was performed by expert in medical education, and analyzed using Content Validity Ratio (CVR). Instrument implemented and tested quantitatively its reliability. Reliability was analyzed with Alpha Cronbach's. The dimensions of clinical competence consisted of: physician-patient relationships, anamnesis, physical examination, diagnostic ability, management, communication skills, and professionalism. CVR obtained positive values ​​on each item so the instrument is valid. Test reliability of the instrument shows Alpha 0.949 so the instrument is reliable. Self-Assessment Instrument of Clinical Competence for Medical The items within the instrument have reflected the overall component of competence and have consistency in measuring the same constructs, so that students can use it to measure their own clinical competence as a self-development material.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2017-08-08</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/16212</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16212</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation; Vol 6 No 1 (2017); 81-89</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2503-1732</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6420</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jrer.v6i1</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jere/article/view/16212/8493</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>