Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Problem-Solving Ability in Four Models of Learning

Journal of Innovative Science Education · Vol. 7 No. 2 (2018) · pp. 229–236

DOI
10.15294/jise.v7i2.24781
ISSN
2502-4523, 2252-6412
Published
2018-09-13
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

The demands of the 21st century and curriculum 2013 is mastered various skills one problem-solving. 2013 curriculum gives a model learning using PBL, PjBL, and DL in exercising a high-level way of thinking that is problem-solving, moreover in the model can give influence on the learning outcomes of students. This research aims to: a) know the difference or not on the ability of problem-solving learning model in four, b) knowing the effectiveness of PBL learning model, the PjBL, DL, and DI against the ability of problem-solving. The research method used was a quasi-experimental design with a posttest-only control group design. The design of this study uses four groups of experiments. The research population was 224 students. Samples taken in cluster random sampling amounted to 128 students. Problem-solving ability data drawn from tests given to students in the form of multiple choice reasoned with the amount of 20 items. The results showed that a) there may be differences in the problem-solving ability of four models of learning are shown with PBL enough (59%), the PjBL of enough (55%), DL enough (51%), and DI enough (50%), b) effectiveness of four models of learning seen from the highest value on every dimension of problem-solving with the results: 1) the model PBL, PjBL, DL, including both categories and models DI categories include enough on solving dimension of meaning or the identification of problems, 2) PBL model including both categories, while the model PJBL, DL, and DI enough categories in dimension using concrete measures to address the problem or design and manage projects, 3) PBL model, PJBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions category acquires, process, interpret, and analyze information to make a decision, 4), PBL, PjBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions involved in the process of investigation solve, and 5), model PBL, PjBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions make connections and transfer learning from one the situation to the other. Thus, the model of PBL, PjBL, and DL is good enough to measure problem-solving ability, but teachers are expected to minimize the use of the model DI this model is still centered on teachers so that students are less than optimal in developing problem-solving abilities.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 168 co-authorship links · 4 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Universitas Airlangga
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Ely RudyatmiAffiliation unknown6
Amin RetnoningsihAffiliation unknown5
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAffiliation unknown5
Wiwi IsnaeniState University of Semarang5
Ning SetiatiAffiliation unknown5
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang4
Sri NgabektiState University of Semarang4
Dyah Rini IndriyantiAffiliation unknown4
Hartono HartonoAffiliation unknown4
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang3
Siti Harnina BintariAffiliation unknown3
Bambang PriyonoState University of Semarang3
Sri SukaesihState University of Semarang3
Andreas Priyono Budi PrasetyoState University of Semarang3
Novi Ratna DewiState University of Semarang3
Kartono KartonoUniversitas Airlangga2
Endang SusiloningsihAffiliation unknown2
Yusuf Zakarias ManutedeAffiliation unknown2
Woro SumarniState University of Semarang2
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang2
Dwi PurwantiAffiliation unknown2
Mohammad AkhlasAffiliation unknown2
Niken SubektiState University of Semarang2
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang2
Yustinus Ulung AnggraitoAffiliation unknown2
Dwita TrianaAffiliation unknown2
Sigit SaptonoState University of Semarang2
Suharto LinuwihmoAffiliation unknown2
Wardono WardonoAffiliation unknown2
Hardi SuyitnoAffiliation unknown2
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown2
Anindita Firdatul JannahAffiliation unknown2
Sugito SugitoAffiliation unknown2
Putut MarwotoState University of Semarang2
Retno Sri IswariState University of Semarang2
Priyantini WidiyaningrumAffiliation unknown2
Ratna Dewi PuspitasariAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 8 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Problem-Solving Ability in Four Models of Learning</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Kharisma, Firlita Nurul</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Susilowati, Sri Mulyani Endang</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Ridlo, Saiful</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">The demands of the 21st century and curriculum 2013 is mastered various skills one problem-solving. 2013 curriculum gives a model learning using PBL, PjBL, and DL in exercising a high-level way of thinking that is problem-solving, moreover in the model can give influence on the learning outcomes of students. This research aims to: a) know the difference or not on the ability of problem-solving learning model in four, b) knowing the effectiveness of PBL learning model, the PjBL, DL, and DI against the ability of problem-solving. The research method used was a quasi-experimental design with a posttest-only control group design. The design of this study uses four groups of experiments. The research population was 224 students. Samples taken in cluster random sampling amounted to 128 students. Problem-solving ability data drawn from tests given to students in the form of multiple choice reasoned with the amount of 20 items. The results showed that a) there may be differences in the problem-solving ability of four models of learning are shown with PBL enough (59%), the PjBL of enough (55%), DL enough (51%), and DI enough (50%), b) effectiveness of four models of learning seen from the highest value on every dimension of problem-solving with the results: 1) the model PBL, PjBL, DL, including both categories and models DI categories include enough on solving dimension of meaning or the identification of problems, 2) PBL model including both categories, while the model PJBL, DL, and DI enough categories in dimension using concrete measures to address the problem or design and manage projects, 3) PBL model, PJBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions category acquires, process, interpret, and analyze information to make a decision, 4), PBL, PjBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions involved in the process of investigation solve, and 5), model PBL, PjBL, DL, and DI including sufficient dimensions make connections and transfer learning from one the situation to the other. Thus, the model of PBL, PjBL, and DL is good enough to measure problem-solving ability, but teachers are expected to minimize the use of the model DI this model is still centered on teachers so that students are less than optimal in developing problem-solving abilities.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-09-13</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:type xml:lang="en-US">Peer-reviewed Article</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/24781</dc:identifier>
	<dc:identifier>10.15294/jise.v7i2.24781</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Innovative Science Education; Vol 7 No 2 (2018); 229-236</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4523</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6412</dc:source>
	<dc:source>10.15294/jise.v7i2</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jise/article/view/24781/11506</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Innovative Science Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>