Melola Discovery

← Melola Discovery

Journal

Improving Science Process Skills Through The Socio-Cultural Inquiry Model

Journal of Primary Education · Vol. 8 No. 2 (2018) · pp. 192–199

ISSN
2502-4515, 2252-6404
Published
2018-09-23
Publisher
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Language
eng

Abstract

This study aims to determine the improvement of science process skills towards grade IV elementary school student science learning using a socio-cultural inquiry model. This research type is Quasy Experimental Design with the form of non-equivalent control group design. The sampling technique used is the type of Cluster Random Sampling. The result of n-gain analysis shows that the Inquiry in the observing, classifying, communicating, and inferring aspect control class gets 0.10; 0.07; 0.09, and -0.08. All aspects of the science process skills are in the low category, while using the socio-cultural Inquiry class observing aspects get 0.61 medium category, classifying get 0.45 as medium category, communicating get 0.26 as low category, and inferring to get 0.30 as low category. The results of the t-test show the difference in the average results of the science process skills on the observing with the result of Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.004 ttable = 2.04. Aspect classifying Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.015 ttable = 2.04. Inferring aspects Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.042 ttable = 2.04. But in the aspect of communicating there is no difference in the average learning outcomes of science process skills between the experimental group and the control group with the results of Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.321 > 0.05 and tvalue 1.000 < ttable = 2.04. The conclusions of this study are the results of the science process skills of the experimental group are higher than the results of the control process of science process skills.

Collaboration network of the authors

40 authors · 164 co-authorship links · 7 across different organisations · showing the 40 most connected

Hover or tap a name to highlight its co-authors. Double-click to open the author's page.

  • State University of Semarang
  • Yogyakarta State University
  • Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Sultan Idris Education University
  • Diponegoro University
  • Hasanuddin University
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Different organisations
  • Same organisation
  • Affiliation unknown
  • Thicker line = more joint articles · bigger circle = more articles
Show as table
Co-authorOrganisationJoint articles
Triyanto TriyantoAffiliation unknown9
Agus CahyonoAffiliation unknown8
Wahyu LestariYogyakarta State University6
Ani RusilowatiState University of Semarang6
Malarsih MalarsihAffiliation unknown5
Udi UtomoAffiliation unknown5
Endang SusilaningsihState University of Semarang5
Wiyanto WiyantoState University of Semarang5
Nanik WijayatiState University of Semarang4
Projo DanoedoroUniversitas Gadjah Mada4
Sunarto SunartoAffiliation unknown3
Totok Sumaryanto FlorentinusState University of Semarang3
Syakir SyakirAffiliation unknown3
Restu LanjariAffiliation unknown3
Sri WardaniAffiliation unknown3
Sri HaryaniAffiliation unknown3
Sri Susilogati SumartiState University of Semarang3
Harjono HarjonoAffiliation unknown3
Sunyoto Eko NugrohoState University of Semarang3
Sudarmin SudarminAffiliation unknown3
Saiful RidloState University of Semarang3
Bambang SubaliAffiliation unknown3
Aisyah Mohamad SharifSultan Idris Education University2
Muhamad TaufiqState University of Semarang2
Wadiyo WadiyoAffiliation unknown2
Totok Sumaryanto FlorentinusAffiliation unknown2
Kasmadi Imam SupardiState University of Semarang2
Edy CahyonoState University of Semarang2
Ian YuliantiAffiliation unknown2
St. Budi WaluyaAffiliation unknown2
Langlang HandayaniAffiliation unknown2
Masturi MasturiHasanuddin University2
Arif WidiyatmokoState University of Semarang2
Budi UtomoDiponegoro University1
Darojatun FikriAffiliation unknown1
Elly ArlianiAffiliation unknown1
Novi SusantiAffiliation unknown1

Affiliations come from OpenAlex; journal OAI-PMH metadata carries none. Authors without an OpenAlex ID are matched by name, which can merge or split people.

Metadata source: OAI-PMH (metadata jurnal) https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jpe/oai, first harvested 6 Nov 2026, last seen 6 Nov 2026.
Original metadata (oai_dc)
<oai_dc:dc xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/  http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
	<dc:title xml:lang="en-US">Improving Science Process Skills Through The Socio-Cultural Inquiry Model</dc:title>
	<dc:creator>Nugraha, Erika Sulistya</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Hartono, Hartono</dc:creator>
	<dc:creator>Nuswowati, Murbangun</dc:creator>
	<dc:description xml:lang="en-US">This study aims to determine the improvement of science process skills towards grade IV elementary school student science learning using a socio-cultural inquiry model. This research type is Quasy Experimental Design with the form of non-equivalent control group design. The sampling technique used is the type of Cluster Random Sampling. The result of n-gain analysis shows that the Inquiry in the observing, classifying, communicating, and inferring aspect control class gets 0.10; 0.07; 0.09, and -0.08. All aspects of the science process skills are in the low category, while using the socio-cultural Inquiry class observing aspects get 0.61 medium category, classifying get 0.45 as medium category, communicating get 0.26 as low category, and inferring to get 0.30 as low category. The results of the t-test show the difference in the average results of the science process skills on the observing with the result of Sig. (2-tailed)&amp;nbsp; of 0.004 &amp;lt; 0.05 and tvalue of 2.94 &amp;gt; ttable = 2.04. Aspect classifying Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.015 &amp;lt; 0.05 and tvalue of 2.49 &amp;gt; ttable = 2.04. Inferring aspects Sig. (2-tailed) of 0.042 &amp;lt; 0.05 and tvalue of 2.07 &amp;gt; ttable = 2.04. But in the aspect of communicating there is no difference in the average learning outcomes of science process skills between the experimental group and the control group with the results of Sig.&amp;nbsp; (2-tailed) of 0.321 &amp;gt; 0.05 and tvalue 1.000 &amp;lt; ttable = 2.04. The conclusions of this study are the results of the science process skills of the experimental group are higher than the results of the control process of science process skills.</dc:description>
	<dc:publisher xml:lang="en-US">Universitas Negeri Semarang</dc:publisher>
	<dc:date>2018-09-23</dc:date>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
	<dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dc:type>
	<dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
	<dc:identifier>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/25990</dc:identifier>
	<dc:source xml:lang="en-US">Journal of Primary Education; Vol 8 No 2 (2019): February 2019; 192-199</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2502-4515</dc:source>
	<dc:source>2252-6404</dc:source>
	<dc:language>eng</dc:language>
	<dc:relation>https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/jpe/article/view/25990/11562</dc:relation>
	<dc:rights xml:lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of Primary Education</dc:rights>
</oai_dc:dc>